Ruorc

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

I think they meant the convicted felon and pedophile Donald Trump. Surely it couldn't be the same guy.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a legit insult to Forrest Gump. She's a corrupt judge in the pockets of the GOP and needs to be removed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You're giving him way too much credit. Never attribute to malice what can be explained by stupidity. While Trump has certainly performed acts out of malice, he is also the epitome of stupidity. He's suggested nuking hurricanes, injecting bleach, and has stared straight into the sun during a solar eclipse, etc, etc. He's a terrible person of course, but he's also a complete moron.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 month ago (8 children)

He doesn't understand the nuances of making policy decisions, so his default answer to stuff like this is to just impose tariffs because that's all he knows. He doesn't care to understand and would likely eat the crayons you use if you were to try to explain it to him. He's just incapable of that sort of mental growth.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Didn't she just release economic plans recently about stopping price gouging?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

Something something unity, right? Republicans are hypocritical yet predictable sacks of shit.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is just disturbing. These people need psychological help.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago

I'm torn on this one. Obviously, the victims deserve to get payment and whatnot, but the other half of this is that the bankruptcy court agreement with the Sackler family would prevent them from future liability for similar cases. Supreme Court is saying the bankruptcy court didn't have the power to grant that, which, if excluded, would open the Sacklers to future lawsuits. I'm all for that family getting sued into oblivion, but we can't trust the Supreme Court to do what's right either. We have to treat everything they do with suspicion. This comes on the heels of the ruling of 'bribery is now basically legal', so it makes me wonder how much the Sackler family is paying them.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 7 months ago

He's probably spying for Putin.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dame la bala, tengo nada sin mi familia. Te veré en hell pájaro.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I heard he had to tren for that job too.

 
view more: next ›