Psiczar

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Did they ever?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

This. There will always be new things to learn or new students to teach. It’s a time capsule, it will never be covered up and should never be covered up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I’d like to say better late than never, but in this case late may end up with the same result as never. Once the ice caps have melted, they can’t melt any further.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Do you even need to overclock a Threadripper?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m confused how this is a win for consumers, it just seems like two companies arguing over who gets to rake in more money.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

No surprises here, they gutted Symantec.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Reincarnation. Unless we’re all in the matrix that’s the only thing I can imagine being remotely plausible.

Waking up in some paradise with all of our loved ones who died before us there is just absurd and I’m amazed so many people blindly accept it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I Imagine they’ll use whatever connections are provided to them by their AI overlords.

The VPn may be necessary if their IP address ranges are being blocked, or it could be to get around an API limit?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wouldn’t be surprised if they are doing it to block AI from hoovering up all of their data.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Seriously? Who would let those clowns touch their IP after what they did to Game of Thrones

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, HTTPS traffic is encrypted also, but I wouldn’t trust that all of your activity online is hidden just because DNS and HTTPS are encrypted.

Up to you, but I use a VPN when online.

view more: ‹ prev next ›