Primarily0617

And "the highest price before it’s too expensive and loss of sales cuts into revenue" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly. Meaning the "highest cost" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly.

As an addendum, you haven't really mentioned anything past a vague idea of "maximum cost" until now, so I'm not really sure what you mean about repeating yourself. Are you okay, friend?

So "highest cost" isn't set by "what the consumer is able to spend"? So what's it set by?

if that's how you want to define "highest cost", then goods absolutely aren't priced at highest cost in a duopoly

they aren't even priced at highest cost in a monopoly, because "all the money a person has" is just cartoon logic

I don't know what this means

The "highest cost possible" is higher in a monopoly than a duopoly.

My point being that while a duopoly may seem like a worst case scenario, it very much isn't.

beats out the brick and mortar store**s**

??????

Yes I'm sure the prices will be the same after there's absolutely no competition at all.

just wait for the reaming you'll get when everybody but amazon goes out of business in your country

that's a gibibyte

a gigabyte is 10^9

you're essentially asking somebody to talk about their hobby, so it makes sense

what the fuck is going on in the comments of that video? The "$AMA59X" bots are doing some of the shoddiest astroturfing I've seen in years