MostlyHarmless

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

Even if the Soviets had given up on the space race, they still had a vested interest in embarrassing America. They had every motivation to prove that America faked it, but they didn't do it, because they had all the evidence that it was real. They could track the space craft and listen in on the same signals everyone else did.

All documentation against the moon landing has been thoroughly debunked many times. But you don't care about that.

You don't have to trust the Americans, there is plenty of independent third party evidence from multiple sources

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand what you are saying. They had a moon landing program.

Also, do you really think that if the Soviets had the opportunity to embarrass the Americans by proving the landing was fake, they wouldn't take it? Of course they would. Instead they were able to track the Apollo mission all the way and knew it was real.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

No they didn't. They had their own moon program and announced their intentions to land in 1961 before the Americans announced in 1962

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_crewed_lunar_programs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

I'm not saying it's different. I'm saying that the current plan in no achieves the goal of keeping the fediverse open and out of the control of large corporations.

If you want to know how to prevent them from taking control, you better start working out the specifics of how they will do that. Otherwise your actions may end up helping them.

No one seems to have considered the possibility that Facebook are well aware of what people think of them. That they looked at the technology and thought "we don't have to do anything, those idiots hate us so much they will do the job for us and give us the private marketplace we desire"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

How? Everyone says some form of this, but never gives any details of how they will do that. Or how defederation will prevent that.

You are afraid that they will control the marketplace, and then turn around telling everyone to defederate, which just gives them a walled garden marketplace on a silver platter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ah, so just fear mongering and hoping that the fear based knee-jerk reaction isn't actually playing directly into their hands.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What point was that? If you don't join Threads, they don't have your data. They do have everything you publish to the Fediverse though, no matter what you do.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They can already harvest the data. Nothing on the ActivityPub is private

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, yeah, parrot the line and then please explain how?

Extending means making extra functionality that others haven't implemented, so that your offering is more attractive. You use it to build a walled garden. Defederation just skips that step and does it for them. They don't even have to extend.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Because every time this argument starts, someone mentions how they don't want the fediverse to go down the xmpp path, and the argument has its origin in this article

https://ploum.net/2023-06-23-how-to-kill-decentralised-networks.html

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I would like to point out that xmpp still exists. Google Talk does not. WhatsApp killed xmpp, not Google

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But it doesn't keep him away. Defederation means they consume all of the data from ActivityPub, you consume none of theirs. You are creating a walled garden for them that makes it harder for Threads users to leave.

view more: next ›