Lol. Maybe they're just looking for Kirk and Spock Peg...toys.
MajorHavoc
The Neelix dislike exists as more of a meme than otherwise.
Yeah. Neelix is fun to joke about, but we love him.
I love the idea that our first message to aliens might be "FRESH WATER ONLY. NO WASTE."
I'm missing a lot of these things, but I've decided that my logical next step is to bootstrap Spain's and Mexico's space programs. (This is sarcasm. I have a snowballs chance in hell of going to space, and I'm okay with that.)
I'm a Google Beta.
I am effectively immortal, but I will probably someday disappear without notice.
I predict a decent bump during the holidays. Annecdotaly, my Nintendo Switch gamer friends have spent the year either buying a StreamDeck or planning to buy a SteamDeck. I bet a significant number of folks will grab one to celebrate the New Year.
What will get manufactured locally will be the things where there's enough margin in it. Nothing to do with how vital or desirable it might be to make locally.
More to your point, I think we agree on that.
My point is that government is for when the open market fails.
Providing margin against known common disasters and shortages is a great use of government power to distort a market.
Tariffs and subsidies can close the gap to provide incentive to have local production of things like clean water, food, power, medical supplies, and computer chips.
In my ideal case, each government would provide consistent local demand, and ship the excess product as goodwill donations to neighbors in need.
We actually see some of that now, but 2020 revealed a number of substantial gaps.
Except corn, which is heavily subsidized in the US.
(I suspect the primary motive is to provide an alternative fuel for the war machine, sadly. But corn is also useable as local transport fuel and even food, which is nice.)
I'm in favor of additional subsidies to support local manufacturing of critical products, to protect the local population against the whims of the global market.
I'm not a huge fan of tariffs, but in theory tariffs can get the same job done. And I'm willing to concede that a balance between subsidies and tariffs might be the sweet spot for practicality, or might be a necessary a step on the journey to pragmatic people centric policies.
I'm with you, but I can see the other side of this.
The US experienced shocking shortages during the global pandemic.
I'm not personally a huge fan of tariffs as the way to keep manufacturing local, but I think it's a goal worth pursuing.
And I value of impact of global trade toward peace, and I'm increasingly inclined to believe it's critical for our survival as a race.
But I'm sympathetic to having some provision for ensuring local production of basic necessities. It's foolish to always assume that someone will be willing and able to ship what we need halfway across the globe.
I'm not sure that tariffs are an acceptable answer, but I am sure that we need to stop assuming there will always be another impoverished nation excited to be exploited to produce things for us cheap.
It's wise to have some provision for locally producing critical things.
This collection is fantastic.
Mildly related - Ryan North's recent contributions to Marvel Comics are full of delight. (Ryan North helped organize Machine Of Death).
True rational self interest would involve creating cooperative structures that give a safety net if anything goes wrong just like how it's rational to get home insurance even if you don't expect to burn your house down.
This is the part that drives me nuts. Plenty of today's decision makers only survive later thanks to social nets. But they're so sure that they won't be, they're willing to cut back social benefits to make a quick buck.
"Muahahahaha!"...
Sorry, a deep resonant haunting laugh is how I cope when faced with a difficult moral conundrum.
(Paraphrased from "Better Off Ted".)