MajorHavoc

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago

"Are we the baddies?" Ask the people who also forbid any media coverage of their actions.

"Muahahahaha!"...

Sorry, a deep resonant haunting laugh is how I cope when faced with a difficult moral conundrum.

(Paraphrased from "Better Off Ted".)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Lol. Maybe they're just looking for Kirk and Spock Peg...toys.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

The Neelix dislike exists as more of a meme than otherwise.

Yeah. Neelix is fun to joke about, but we love him.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I love the idea that our first message to aliens might be "FRESH WATER ONLY. NO WASTE."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm missing a lot of these things, but I've decided that my logical next step is to bootstrap Spain's and Mexico's space programs. (This is sarcasm. I have a snowballs chance in hell of going to space, and I'm okay with that.)

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm a Google Beta.

I am effectively immortal, but I will probably someday disappear without notice.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I predict a decent bump during the holidays. Annecdotaly, my Nintendo Switch gamer friends have spent the year either buying a StreamDeck or planning to buy a SteamDeck. I bet a significant number of folks will grab one to celebrate the New Year.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What will get manufactured locally will be the things where there's enough margin in it. Nothing to do with how vital or desirable it might be to make locally.

More to your point, I think we agree on that.

My point is that government is for when the open market fails.

Providing margin against known common disasters and shortages is a great use of government power to distort a market.

Tariffs and subsidies can close the gap to provide incentive to have local production of things like clean water, food, power, medical supplies, and computer chips.

In my ideal case, each government would provide consistent local demand, and ship the excess product as goodwill donations to neighbors in need.

We actually see some of that now, but 2020 revealed a number of substantial gaps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Except corn, which is heavily subsidized in the US.

(I suspect the primary motive is to provide an alternative fuel for the war machine, sadly. But corn is also useable as local transport fuel and even food, which is nice.)

I'm in favor of additional subsidies to support local manufacturing of critical products, to protect the local population against the whims of the global market.

I'm not a huge fan of tariffs, but in theory tariffs can get the same job done. And I'm willing to concede that a balance between subsidies and tariffs might be the sweet spot for practicality, or might be a necessary a step on the journey to pragmatic people centric policies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm with you, but I can see the other side of this.

The US experienced shocking shortages during the global pandemic.

I'm not personally a huge fan of tariffs as the way to keep manufacturing local, but I think it's a goal worth pursuing.

And I value of impact of global trade toward peace, and I'm increasingly inclined to believe it's critical for our survival as a race.

But I'm sympathetic to having some provision for ensuring local production of basic necessities. It's foolish to always assume that someone will be willing and able to ship what we need halfway across the globe.

I'm not sure that tariffs are an acceptable answer, but I am sure that we need to stop assuming there will always be another impoverished nation excited to be exploited to produce things for us cheap.

It's wise to have some provision for locally producing critical things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

This collection is fantastic.

Mildly related - Ryan North's recent contributions to Marvel Comics are full of delight. (Ryan North helped organize Machine Of Death).

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

True rational self interest would involve creating cooperative structures that give a safety net if anything goes wrong just like how it's rational to get home insurance even if you don't expect to burn your house down.

This is the part that drives me nuts. Plenty of today's decision makers only survive later thanks to social nets. But they're so sure that they won't be, they're willing to cut back social benefits to make a quick buck.

 

I'm usually the one saying "AI is already as good as it's gonna get, for a long while."

This article, in contrast, is quotes from folks making the next AI generation - saying the same.

 

"We need policies that keep middlemen weak."

stood out to me.

Many of my influences have railed against middle men, and I think that's unfair. I've worked with plenty of middle men that made everyone then better off.

I've also had the unique displeasure that at least half of all links shared with me in recent years have been to a site called "Instagram", where I am unable to access the content without an account (which I refuse to make because Zuckerberg is a creepy stalker.)

I find it deeply weird that such a locked ecosystem now controls so much attention.

I find Cory Doctorow's thoughts on the problem and potential solutions to be both hopeful and cathartic.

127
The Cult of Microsoft (www.wheresyoured.at)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Kind of an inflammatory title, but I like to let it match for accessibility.

I've been enjoying Ed Zitron's articles lately, because they call out CEOs who aren't doing their jobs.

I'm sharing this partly because I'm honestly surprised to see criticism of Satya Nadella's leadership. I think Satya has been good for Microsoft, overall, compared to previous leaders. And I was as convinced as anyone else when the "growth mindset" first hit the news cycle. It sounds fine, after all.

TL;DR:

  • Satya has baked "growth mindset deeply into the culture at Microsoft"
  • Folks outside of the original study authors have generally failed to reproduce evidence of any value in "growth mindset"
  • Microsoft is, of course "all in" on their own brand of AI tools, and their AI tools are doing the usual harmful barf, eat the barf, barf grosser barf, re-eat that barf data corruption cycle.
  • Some interesting speculation that none of the AI code flaunted by Microsoft and Google is probably high value. Which is a speculation I confidently share, but still, I think, speculation. (Lines-of-code is a bat shit insane way to measure engineer productivity, but some folks think it's okay when an AI is doing it.)
 

You might recognize me from such comments as "All AI hucksters are scammers.", and "AI is just an excuse to enshitify while laying off real engineers.", and "I actually use current generation LLMs for a bunch of things and it can be pretty great."

In this article science fiction author and futurist Cory Doctorow is on my favorite AI soap box, and raises some interesting points.

1
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Since I couldn't find it, here's a bare minimum guide to starting using the Pipeworks mod.

This recipe builds a trivial item sorter.

Mods you need:

  • Pipeworks
  • Mesecon
  • I3 Inventory (optional, strongly recommend)

Resources you need (if building this in survival):

  • 24 wood planks for 4 chests
  • a lot of leaves (for plastic for tubes and for the injector)
  • a lot of mese Crystals (for the injector and the sorting tube segment and the blinky plant)
  • 3 saplings (for the blinky plant)
  • 2 iron for the injector

To build the parts - look up the part recipes in I3 Inventory, or the MineTest wiki.

The Build:

In this order, place, on flat ground, in a straight line:

  • A chest
  • A stack wise filter injector
  • A pneumatic tube segment
  • A sorting pneumatic tube segment
  • A final chest

Now place the last two chests on the ground on either side of the 'sorting pneumatic tube segment'.

Now place a 'blinky plant' beside the 'stackwise filter injector', to get it running. Yes, it must be a blinky plant.

Now throw some crap in the first chest and watch it get moved randomly to the other 3 chests.

Now, grab an item you want sorted, say 'dirt block'. Left click on the 'sorting pneumatic tube segment'. Put the dirt block next to one of the colors. Put more dirt blocks into the first chest.

Watch the dirt blocks follow the color you chose.

Repeat with more item types.

Now your inventory is sorted, kind of.

Finally, add additional chests and sorting tube segments, as needed, to suit your personal play style.

Edit: Of course now I found a decent wiki page that has more detail, so I put that in the URL.

1
Newbie Lessons (programming.dev)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Here's things I learned, so far, as a new player of Minetest. I'm new at this, so I'll gladly update this post with any corrections.

  • Mineclone2 is a great place to just start playing!
  • When confident enough to choose my own plugins, I switched back to MineGame/default, for the bigger library of available plugins.
  • Mesecons is redstone, but looks way nicer. Insulated wires alone look like a huge sanity saver.
  • The world is dramatically taller and deeper, so you're going to want a teleporter or elevator plugin. I found Travelnet a practical option.
  • if you're coming from Java edition Minecraft, you may be pleasantly surprised how much faster, lighter and more efficient Mineclone is.
  • The hang glider plugin is a giggle and a half.
  • Building a Cotton farm was a quicker path to beds and hang gliders, for me, than searching for sheep.
view more: next ›