Madison420

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 17 hours ago (9 children)

This is the second round of bombings with seemingly benign objects.

They are quite literally bought OTC they are in fact civilian objects, that's why terrorists use them....

Seriously, a book.. once.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

No they didn't. They very specifically never stopped actions in countries they aren't at war with and notably as the article states THEY WERE PLANTING BOMBS IN CIVILIAN ITEMS again in countries they aren't at war with.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 21 hours ago (14 children)

What do you think about Israel never ceasing hostilities?

For real, read a book every once in awhile.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"you're a nut! You're crazy in the coconut!" "What does that mean? That boy needs therapy!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

You're intended to read the comment you reply to... Yes.

You first boo boo.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

No , it can infer character.

It's not going to change objective fact.

Read that statement and go point by point as to why you believe it could only be serious. You'll be left having to say it's probably sarcastic because of its content not it's creators character.

MLK talked about this shit dude.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

You misunderstand, they're being sarcastic.

Ed: to be specific they reference the most famous result of unexpected consequences.

The US government created a virus managed stucnet that infested and threw off industrial controllers of a specific brand they knew were used with Iranian centrifuges that enrich nuclear material. Their plan worked and the centrifuges were destroyed.

Later on they found out stuxnet accidently infected a bunch of other controllers, ones that were in hospitals, power plants ect. It ended up being one of the most widespread viruses ever.

Essentially they're saying planting bombs in pagers could never have unexpected consequences. /S

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Backwards. Ti made calculators from technology derived from their experience in the defense industry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

On occasion sure on delivery.

On the chuck wagon, the same way they would carry beef they didn't slaughter on the go with the bonus that slaughtering as you go prevents you having to carry extra weight on the wagon until you actually need to. You know with beef being self propelled until it's slaughtered and all.

You carry the salt anyway. How do you think they prepared meals the hunted? It's far more efficient what are you even on about.

It's like you've never read a book or at the very least played Oregon trail.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can and did, head of cattle per set distance were a common form of payment.

view more: ‹ prev next ›