Lauchs

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

That would be ideal for fans but I guess Disney doesn't view that as profit maximizing?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 15 hours ago

To paraphrase the Beatles "they get high with a little help from their friends"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Stanford and Harvard both have all sorts of interesting lecture series online! Harvard has stuff like urban design, religious history, art history, the relationship between cooking and physics, biology, Chinese history and much more!

https://pll.harvard.edu/catalog/free

Haven't taken any with Stanford but here's a link to their catalogue:

https://online.stanford.edu/free-courses

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

You are not reading what's being written.

And are one hundred percent taking the bait, like he expects you to. And to a casual American who remembers that 2016-2020 didn't result in extermination camps, ended with a transfer of power to a different political party and no invading sovereign nations, well, your claim makes you seem like an unreliable source of information.

Again, I think trump is dangerous to American democracy but you are helping his cause.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I've fallen out of star wars as the recent stuff has been mediocre (or Andor which was "quality television" but felt, to me out of place in a galaxy ruled by space wizards with laser swords) but damn, seeing that wolfman dude and the notion of Urkel... Well, I'm tempted!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I'm still not sure I get this. Is it just odd for them to be looking at a hangnail?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I don't think he's a genius but knows one game very well, and it's treating the Left/media the same way I treated my younger sister when I was an asshole; wind her up, watch her melt down, over-react and get in trouble.

And we take the bait EVERY. GODDAMN. TIME.

He's not imitating Nazis by accident and he's not doing it because he's a Nazi. He's doing it because it makes us make ourselves look like hysterical children.

Edit: It's not 78D chess, it's the easiest game to play. Couldn't be much more simple as far as politics go.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

That's an.... interesting opinion.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's why we have to vote in primaries for non-evil.

But we get outvoted, badly, by senior citizens so old time politics reigns supreme.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Oh no, I get that. I think he's echoing that stuff intentionally but more to make us cry fascist etc. He loves our reaction to the dictator but only on day one schtick, his side sees it as a joke, we take it deadly serious and I worry median voters think "he was already president, we still have a democracy, these guys are over-reacting."

We can be simultaneously right AND lose the persuasion game. I'd rather win the persuasion game.m as that matters more than being right.

I think about Jan 6, with horrifies Democratic leaning folks but to a large swathe of the public, it doesn't seem to register as a concern compared to inflation etc.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Fair, I play more RPGs and whatnot where a knife takes 4 years to injure someone. (Though, a bad sword can take just as long because, I dunno, it's too dull to chop through this peasant's leather tunic? Goddamnit Ultima.)

 

Apologies if gifs aren't allowed!

27
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Almost everyone agrees there should be more compromises in politics. So I'm curious, how would that play out?

While I love the policy debates and the nuances, most people go for the big issues. So, according to the party platforms/my gut, here's what I'd put as the 3 for each party:

Democrats: Abortion rights, gun control, climate change.

Republicans: Immigration, culture war (say, critical race theory in schools or gender affirming care for minors) , trump gets to be president. (Sorry but it really seems like a cult of personality at this point.)

Anyway, here's the exercise: say the other side was willing to give up on all three of their issues but you had to give up on one of your side's. OR, you can have two of your side's but have to give up on the third.

Just curious to see how this plays out. (You are of course free to name other priorities you think better represent the parties but obviously if you write "making Joe Pesci day a national holiday" as a priority and give it up, that doesn't really count.)

Edit: The consensus seems to be a big no to compromise. Which, fair, I imagine those on the Right feel just as strongly about what they would call baby murdering and replacing American workers etc.

Just kind of sad to see it in action.

But thanks/congrats to those who did try and work through a compromise!

 

Having large numbers of people starve to death seems like a pretty damning indictment of a system. But I dunno, maybe I'm overly attached to food?

 

Listened to Billie Jean while cleaning, wondered what the all time playlist might be.

I imagine Kanye, Clapton, Pink Floyd, James Brown, Ike Turner all make the cut with MJ but I'm curious what Lemmy comes up with!

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: next ›