Kimano

Honestly, this seems great. There's a lot of people in the world that are the same way to help you with the same thing as a bit of a bit of a lot of people in the world but I think they are you and I don't know what to do with it but I don't know what to do with it but I don't think it is a good idea to be a bit of a relationship but I don't think it is a good idea but I don't think it is a thing but I don't think it is a thing but it doesn't matter to me to be a bit of a relationship and then it is a thing but it doesn't matter to me now that it's just enough money and it is not a good thing to do it as a relationship and I can do it to me but I think it's like a different relationship.

I mean that and a b25 weighs like 40k lbs and a 767 weighs like 400k lbs, and flies twice as fast.

People also don't realize that too much power is just as bad as too little, worse in fact. There's always useful power sinks: pumped hydro, batteries, thermal storage, but these are not infinite.

Lion batteries have flames without explosions because of design considerations with the batteries: vent holes that allow pressure and heat to escape a failing battery. It's possible that if those safeguards were compromised, you could trigger an actual explosion.

It keeps happening because people are human and make mistakes.

And the guy who invented it didn't ever have to use it for decades afterwards, it was purely theoretical to him.

JD Vance is the only guy who can join the mile high club without leaving his seat.

Same but also add "less" and "fewer"

There's also been tons of academic studies on it that back it up.

Protonmail is encrypted and they literally cannot decrypt to record your data.

I mean that guy is being an idiot, but it's also not quite that simple. There is still more and less ethical consumption. A fairphone is more ethical than an iPhone, and pointing that out in good faith to someone complaining about Apple's behavior seems entirely fair.

It's not a complete fallacy to point out that someone is consuming something less ethical when they have a better option. Obviously it's impossible for anyone to do this with literally everything, but absolutely you can avoid Starbucks because of their treatment of unions, and frequent a local coffee shop instead.

Granted this is mostly assuming two people having a good faith discussion, which on the internet is infrequent lol.

It also could be referencing something that they were better at in their prime, but may no longer be able to do due to age. Like answering running if your dad was a professional runner or something.