Kazumara

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Flexoptix reprogrammable tranceivers are a godsend for that. We use them almost exclusively at work and so do quite a few of ours customers (Universities and other places of higher education). But it's probably hard to justify the cost of a reprogrammer box for a household. You can buy their transceivers pre-programmed though.

FScom has something similar, but I can't vouch for those, never tried. Their patch cables are fine though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In a typical PON (GPON, XG-PON, XGS-PON) you have a single fiber from the central office to the optical splitter in the street, from where up to 64 subscribers are connected one fiber each. The bit between central office and splitter is shared. The splitter is passive and just sends 1/64 of the light to each downstream port, in the other direction it combines all the downsteam light towards the upstream port.

The OLT in the central office sends on one wavelength (e.g. 1577 nm) and all subscriber ONTs send on one other common wavelenth (e.g. 1270 nm). In both directions a time division technique is applied. I believe in the downstream the individual time frames are encrypted with different keys in turn, such that only the specific destination ONT can read the content of their specific time frames. In the upstream the ONTs have to make sure only to send in their own slots, as otherwise the OLT would receive superimposed optical signals that couldn't be read. You can probably see how this could go wrong if a neighbor had malfunctioning equipment.

The alternative doesn't really have a set of standards like PON, as you can just use whatever optical transceivers you want for each customer individually. Though I guess that for operational reasons an ISP would still standardise the setup for all customers. For example the ISP whose services I subscribe to tells customers to use "Bidir LR, 10 km, TX1310, RX1490-1550 nm", as 1G, 10G, or 25G, depending on which you order.

To distringuish such a setup from a PON setup I have seen it being called point-to-point (P2P).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Because PONs are just fundamentally worse. Why would anyone turn fiber of all things into a shared medium. Just lay fibers from the dwelling up to the central office. It's barely any costlier since the real expense is the digging, not the fiber. And it's basically guaranteed to scale forever by simply replacing the optics on the ends. That kind of infrastructure can also be leased out to other providers on an individual dwelling granularity. With PONs competitors are forced into reselling bandwidth, at best, or the infrastructure can be monopolised fully.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As opposed to a normal fiber link to the switch in the central office. No oversubscription or shared media.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

70 out of 6000 is more than 1%, not 0.01%

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Ew it's PON based

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I just read today that the newest version of ROCm (5.7.1) supports the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, the first consumer GPU to have official support in a long time. That one is about three times your budget, so there is no way to get an officially supported one. Reportedly some unsupported models work too, but I'd say you're looking at a lot of hurdles here.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

One with a fluid electrolyte. That includes current Lithium-Ion and Lithium-Polymer batteries, as well as the older Nickle-Metal Hydride and Lead-Acid batteries.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they have any application in optical networking, like making wavelength selective switches (WSS) cheaper, more reliable, or smaller.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh yes, sure you can, 140 dB is 0.000014 MB. The confusing thing is just that the non-SI unit byte also uses the symbol "B" and uses the SI prefix "M" quite often.

Sometimes when I calculate optical power levels I actually use B in between. For example:

How much signal is 88 optical channels at 1.6 dBm of power each?

0 dBm = 1 mW by definition

1.6 dB = 0.16 B = log10 ( x ) --> x = 10 ^ 0.16 = 1.45

So 1.6 dBm is 1.45 * 1 mW = 1.45 mW

Then 88 channels is 88 * 1.45 mW = 127.60 mW = 127.60 * 1 mW

log10(127.60) = 2.11 B = 21.1 dB

So 127.20 mW is 21.1 dBm, just below the output specification of our amplifier, good, nothing should melt.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Just a small note, it's written dB, small "d", big "B".

"B" is the unit symbol for bel and "d" is the symbol for the SI prefix deci, a tenth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a kid I had my own PC early and my dad set it up left handed for me. Now I've played games left handed in general for 23 years, and shooters in particular for 15 years already, it's too late to relearn :-)

view more: ‹ prev next ›