Juice

joined 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

So no, no one understands it.

What was the last nail, exactly? I don't see how swapping out neo-liberal drivel with "scientific Marxist drivel" would be any improvement

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It appears you've discovered the flaw in my post

But since its a misrepresentation of Lenin I'm still right

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (15 children)

Does anybody understand what this meme is trying to say? I feel like its pretty obvious

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago

Cuz that's what this meme is trying to abandon - science

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Not pictured here: people who study history, political and social history, organizes IRL, cares about democracy, tries to understand and communicate with others the need for revolutionary political, social, democratic, and economic changes while acknowledging the challenges of that necessity

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The current productive apparatus already produces much more than is necessary to take care of everybody's needs. Which means we could do degrowth, egalitarianism, and improve standard of living for everybody at a fraction of our current output. The free market is a kind of planning, its an inefficient one that delivers profits to owners and corporations and stockholders. While creating monumental amounts of waste.

The means of production are ripe, maybe beyond ripe, but the class of workers has to seize them for mutual benefit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Everything is mint flavored

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Posadism always proves itself correct

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago

No, I think they should make price controls on goods and raise the minimum to $30 per hour

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as you don't mind me doing some lollygaggin

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The ball was red, like a red rubber ball. The person was sort of indistinct from the neck up, it was more like my view was focused on the ball itself and didn't see a face, but it was a man, wearing a white shirt and dark tie, and dark pants. The ball was about the size of a baseball, wasn't completely smooth and shiny, sort of a matte with a slight grippy texture. Table was square, wood, like a medium brown color. The ball rolled off the table and bounced a few times.

All these decisions were automatic when reading the prompt, it's what I saw.

I've just become aware of aphantasia myself, I have a few family members who have it apparently. I was talking to my BIL about it the other day, I was saying how I'm a big fan of reading, but I mostly read nonfiction. He said he doesn't read much, mostly biographies, but fiction doesn't do much for him because he can't picture anything in his head. I can picture everything in great detail when I read fiction. Its interesting because our minds work very differently

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

We all have our part to play in making the world an amusing place, dagnabbit

view more: ‹ prev next ›