Gorgritch_umie_killa

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 17 hours ago

Tickets/Voucher for a rock climbing centre could be up his alley.

If you want something that will last you could get him a powder bag, or his first Carabiner as well.

Be prepared that the climbing place might not let him use the Carabiner in conjunction with their equipment though, so it might sit around until he got his own harness if he ever went that far. Powder bag would be all good.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Welcome!!! Come over to Aussie Zone for a banter anytime you like!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So, further to mu previous comment, no you shouldn't need to create an account on each instance you want to explore. At best creating an account on the instance might make navigability better.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Mastodon is single developer

I think he has a few people with him now. But i listened to the interview at the start of the year, so i'm starting to the detail.

Exploring instances should be as easy as looking up any other website. At least to get their 'local' front page. Or just navigate to them through that link above.

As an example you could look up jlai.lu, a french instance. They're pretty active.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

No idea on Mastodon myself. I've heard a couple interviews of the developer, seems like a cool guy. But thats about all i can say.

I's playing round with this instance and community finder the other night, works really well. Might be useful to find a more active community that you'll enjoy.

https://lemmyverse.net/communities

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (8 children)

The instance could be a problem if you scroll through the 'local' feed often and thats where you see a lot of things you don't wish to see. A European or special interest instance might suit your context, (Portuguese?), better.

I spend more time on my 'local' (aussie zone) feed than 'subscribed' or 'all' and its definitely nicer, so a move like this can work.

But you could also optimise your own 'subscriber' feed as another option.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Its a trade deal for military technology. Where the US already is in the superior bargaining position for re/setting terms, agenda, and prices.

I don't know why anyone in Australia, or the world, thinks thats in jeopardy. Even the most craven of administrations would love this, as far as i know, uncapped 'deal'.

At most the screws might be turned, but our unimaginative military leaders will always recommend we pay, or rely on the US' decisions in regards agenda or terms.

They will do this, because they seem to have no genuine ideas for builing our own defense capabilities. Their answer is always the same.

A wise government would be directing companies around Australia to build up the Australian military industrial supply systen in the national interest. They should've given up the slower single large contract tendering processes when the Russians tried to decapitate Kyiv.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

A roadway allowed multiple speeds across the lanes could be how to get around this.

If the citizens of a transport zone don't like the rules as they stand, ie, one single speed for all lanes, they should lobby to vary them.

Apart from cases where multiple speeds happen, the speed limit is the speed limit, the person behind contravenes rules if they speed, use the shoulder, etc. They're in the wrong, they have agency, and decide to cause the unsafe situation.

The person ahead, as that video showed to the tune of straight funktown, may cause worsened traffic conditions, but they're not the people being dangerous on the road. (Assuming they are going within the range of the expected limit)

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (2 children)
  1. Often people use those lanes to speed. If a car ahead is overtaking at or within a reasonable range of the speed limit, but not at the speed the speeder wants to travel. The speeder must be patient, they don't get to dictate what manoeuvres are happening ahead.

  2. The argument you present at the end isn't logical,

... Always do the safest thing.

I can largely agree with this sentiment, but you say before,

People who sit in lane 3 at 69mph are breaking the law and likely to cause an accident by forcing people to pass on the wrong side out of frustration (yes illegal but they will do it)...

If undercutting is the most unsafe thing for the person behind to do in the situation, then as your sentiment captures, the frustrated party undercutting are still in the wrong.

They are in the wrong because, they have failed to 'always do the safest thing' in the given situation.

  1. Never be the reason someone else does something stupid on the road.

Nice sentiment again, but it implicitly assigns a rigid cause and effect regime to a situation where the 'frustrated party' behind has their own agency and likely as much training. There is no necessity that they undercut, it is a choice the party behind makes. The cause does not necessitate that effect, at best it could contribute.

In essence the sentiment shifts the blame from the person causing a potential accident (the undercutter), to the person ahead who, at worst, is causing poor traffic conditions.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Speed limit is the speed limit. End of.

If someone wants to go above the speed limit in the fast lane, then they're contravening road rules.

No matter what social norm people believe there to be, it doesn't have precedence over the speed limits.

In a case where the the car in front is going slower than the speed limit, it would be good etiquette though to move over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh okay. I only have a vague sense of these things due to family members being big into running.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

What a great idea! :)

 

Seriously? Why is this an issue?

Sounds like the coach has a known personal connection with the Korean swimmer, and was showing support and solidarity with his international friends and competitors.

From my reading his behaviour sounds very Australian. And good on him. Sure maybe he could've just wished him well, but in the excitement and business of the day who can blame him for being a little over the top.

We aren't really a country that expresses a win at all costs attitude, but thats the impression i get about the other team members quoted in the article. Their comments seem a bit un-Australian to me.

 

https://theconversation.com/dont-feel-bad-about-bingeing-tv-humans-have-binged-stories-for-thousands-of-years-231713

https://heraldonlinejournal.com/2024/06/14/just-over-the-horizon/

The articles above inspired me to to meld the two premises in the articles together in the post below. A lunch time read for anyone interested. :)

Australians are a nation of travellers, it's been said that at any one time during the year there are over a million Australians abroad. It's worth noting that it's not said that a good chunk of that cohort are in Bali, our go-to destination of tropical delights!

But what are we doing when abroad? True many spend precious, and too fleeting, moments with distant families, but many are also touring a destination they may have no or minimal familial connection with. I think I have an answer, not the answer, just an answer. And this answer contains an insight into how today we are failing to design and build our own cities to capture the imagination. Bear with me, i'm gona be pulling some long bows on this one.

“Don't feel bad about bingeing TV. Humans have binged stories for thousands of years.” An article offered by Darius von Guttner Sporzynski from Australian Catholic University this week on The Conversation website is a short exploration of the consumption of storytelling.

D. Sporzynski wastes no time dispelling the negative connotations around bingeing. Instead offering an anthropic historical record of the “human desire to be completely immersed in a story.” He lauds bingeing as an act of unrestrained and excessive indulgence. Using examples as far ranging as Palawa Aboriginal (Tassie) oral stories that could refer to events 12,000 years in our pasts to theatre, television, or the moral panics brought on by serialised literature.

Of course, from a certain point of view touring a destination could then also be regarded as a form of bingeing. Certainly experiences in my pre-poll of one, (me), bear out the “unrestrained and excessive indulgence” of touring a destination, my trips to Paris were deluxe all those years ago, thank you for asking. ;) Instead of a piece of art, or literature, or even beer, I suggest we can binge on a destination, in fact why not indulge on whole cities.

Australia might not have fully bingeable cities like Paris or New York, Sydney comes closest (maybe even is), plenty of places around the country have flashes in the pan but fall a little short at the moment. Maybe it's simply due to our country being reasonably young, but I think part of it is the buildings we're constructing in this era. Even the ones where we're trying, for example One Barangaroo, (that big tall new one in Sydney), it's nice, but i'm not sure it adds a great deal to the feel or life of Sydney.

In Western Australia if there's a single destination that has the potential to be bingeable it's Fremantle. Roel Loopers’ Fremantle Herald article, Just Over the Horizon, tells us the city of Fremantle is “embarking on a spatial vision City Plan to shape the future…”

In the article R.Loopers laments sameness, and demands diversity in type, form and use of the buildings developers should be forced to build in the city of Fremantle, stating “level 2 looks the same as level 12, etc and that needs to change.”

He offers suggestions like high rises surrounded by townhouses, single function buildings broken up by different facades, he even suggests the historic Fremantle prison becoming part/neighbouring a mixed use development along with the football field.

It is right to demand this of developers in our cities, especially in those places around our country like Fremantle or Sydney who have the potential to create a touring destination, that, in its discovery and excitement can be a dopamine hit that demolishes the dopamine hits of the latest tv series. But a bingeable city isn't accidentally created, it is demanded and loved.

D.Sporzynski describes “humans desire to escape from reality and engage emotionally with stories.” I say that is what our one million travellers abroad are doing. They are engaging emotionally with far off cities like Paris, London, Tokyo, and of course even our beloved Bali. As D.Sporzynski says, we are developing the 17th and 18th century enlightenment ideal of a critical view of the world through our experiences abroad, but we should take the opportunity now and use our foresight to make our cities bingeable destinations. Sorry developers, concrete and glass boxes aren't enough.

By Gorgritch_umie_killa

 

The ABC are taking some poorly thought and knee-jerk decisions lately. They instead should take a State-like approach to their decision making.

I mean, management need to treat their tenure as a small period in an organisation that continues forever. A perspective change, hopefully leading to better deliberative decisions.

No need to rush when you have eternity to play with.

 

Man, first the Stokes Stoush, now the facebook right hook. Twiggys making enemies with all the big media companies.

I haven't read why the public prosecutor isn't pursuing this. I'm sure it'll be some reasonable reason due to some legislation the prosecutors can't get around. Or something to that effect.

But this case seems emblimatic of the corporate geared legislative structure the five-eyes countries citizens have had foisted upon them. Yet again an obviously in the wrong company is walking away laughing as their pockets jingle, while the damage caused by their products to third parties goes largely unrestrained. Do we really want to carry on down this path?

For context this morning i've also been listening to Ralph Nader, so thats where my minds at right now.

Link to the episode, if people want to listen: https://www.capitalisnt.com/episodes/ralph-naders-capitalism

 

I hope the comet becomes visible

 

Are these only a WA thing?

Any Eastern states peeps know about these and are able to dispell this notion?

 

This statement from the article is so poignant, **"I've got a full-time job, you know, I've got a life. I don't want to be spending all my time thinking about this." **

We are obsessed with increasing our productivity in this country. A measure i'm unsure is appropriate, or even directly comparable historically in an economy that has switched from agrarian and closed off manufacturing, to mining and services.

I see the housing system we have as a great example that fails Banerjee and Duflo's second key lesson about improving the lives of the poor.

"the poor bear responsibility for too many aspects of their lives." (Poor Economic, Banerjee and Duflo)

By increasing housing pressure by,

  1. Increasing buyer competition for a home,

  2. inflating prices in comparison to wages,

  3. Rising insurance costs, and now finally,

  4. interest rates

we are tamping down on the productive potential of generations of Australians coming through the system.

I am sure, (but have no evdence for this), these generations of people are spending more time, capital, and energy on housing themselves than the generations in later half of the 20th Century. In other words, we are actively making each generation relatively poorer than the last. I think there is a productivity dividend that we are leaving on the table by making housing oneself relatively more difficult.

 

Excellent interview by Joe Walker with Peter Singer.

A really interesting part towards the end of the interview about Australia's (after colonisation) unique ethics foundations compared to US and UK, and possible reasons for the differences, given the closeness of relations.

 

If your bored tonight, don't forget Utopia is out, its a documentary about how ineffective our government really is... /s

https://iview.abc.net.au/show/utopia

view more: next ›