Deebster

joined 3 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I thought you mean he'd mailed it to you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

It's almost a productivity hack.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

You're right, and even the Lemmy devs get this wrong in the docs:

You can upvote posts that you like so that more users will see them, or downvote posts so that they are less likely to be seen.

Note that it doesn't talk about the quality or appropriateness of the comment, just that you can suppress it by downvoting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok, so Lemmy doesn't cause the same amount of duplication, but I'd still argue that dedupe is valuable: it saves on hosting costs (your costs, in this case) and users will get a small advantage in having slightly higher cache hits.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Yes, for example go to https://infosec.exchange/explore

I see the top post as https://infosec.exchange/@[email protected]/113433063621462027 and the image is https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/cache/media_attachments/files/113/433/063/582/671/258/original/71da3801e4e4f08c.png

The link is to the original on https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/113/433/062/676/773/993/original/f828afef5cc7ed1c.png but when you click image the javascript loads a modal with the local cached version (same image as the thumbnail that infosec.exchange loads.

There's lots of different codebases across the fediverse so perhaps some hotlink, but local copies is the default.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think the major advantage is the deduplication - when an image goes viral across Mastodon (or Lemmy) it's currently stored hundreds or thousands of times, each with its own cost. Do you dedupe (for either your customers' benefit or your own)?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

The botsin.space Mastodon server shutting down is sad news, it's a pretty important server and if you didn't like bots it was handy that you could just block one server and block loads of them at once.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That makes me want to see if an old blog is still posting... Overheard on the Tube, Overheard in London, something like that...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Maybe something like a Teasmade, which you can set to make tea at a certain time, like a caffeinated alarm clock.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

I just woke up and this confused me

gif of Tony Soprano

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Perhaps if your eyes are on the forehead and mouth. It's more like a shadow effect.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The Indian guy one is brilliant.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/42084543

Talking about sexruleity

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15848615

Buckfast Tonic Wine - Tasting Notes

 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8430628

Boat rule

 

I've been reading something spooky/creepy/horrific around this time for a few years now. Does anyone else do this? Any recommendations?

My reads:

  • 2023: Perfectly Preventable Deaths by Deirdre Sullivan
  • 2022: Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier
  • 2021: Phantom of the Opera by Gaston Leroux
  • 2020: The Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman
  • 2019: Red Dragon by Thomas Harris
  • 2018: Lincoln in the Bardo by George Saunders & Something Wicked this Way Comes by Ray Bradbury
  • 2017: Carrie by Stephen King
  • 2016: Jekyll and Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson
  • 2015: The Legend of Sleepy Hollow by Washington Irving
  • 2014: The Shadow Over Innsmouth by H. P. Lovecraft
  • 2012: The Call of Cthulhu by H. P. Lovecraft
  • 2009: Dracula by Bram Stoker
  • 2008: Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
 

I used to think typos meant that the author (and/or editor) hadn't checked what they wrote, so the article was likely poor quality and less trustworthy. Now I'm reassured that it's a human behind it and not a glorified word-prediction algorithm.

view more: next ›