Danterious

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

You know if you want to do something more effective than just putting copyright at the end of your comments you could try creating an adversarial suffix using this technique. It makes any LLM reading your comment begin its response with any specific output you specify (such as outing itself as a language model or calling itself a chicken).

It gives you the code necessary to be able to create it.

There are also other data poisoning techniques you could use just to make your data worthless to the AI but this is the one I thought would be the most funny if any LLMs were lurking on lemmy (I have already seen a few).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

map of the Westphall universe

I just searched it up and yeah something like that would work.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner%27s_dilemma#Zero-determinant_strategies

Actually, mathematically speaking, in the long run they tend to eventually fail.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I think so. If you are talking about the evolution of trust one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Sorta a long shot but do you know any books on just general information needed to rebuild a society after it collapses?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah I totally agree. I'm trying my best to integrate these things into my life today.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Someone else on this thread mentioned parallel structures and that is probably what is going to be needed.

Side topic, how did you get your username to do that?

Edit: It was @[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Yeah but that doesn't get rid of the fact that the information it self is still easily reproducible. What you are saying is that there still needs to be effort in curating information, but you aren't saying that there is a cost of reproducing information.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that we do live in a society where information is not scarce because the ease of replicating any information has increased significantly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah my mistake. I'm gonna fix the title.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (38 children)

I specifically said we are in a post-scarcity information society. I didn't say everything is post-scarcity.

@[email protected]

view more: ‹ prev next ›