Blass_Rose

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Honestly, my right hand looks BETTER than my left hand. Only explanation that makes sense to me that I've heard is that since I know I suck with my left hand, I take it much slower and pay more attention.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I found this out when an old phone stopped getting updates, so I was gonna push a third-party OS, but no, even though it was a carrier unlocked MODEL, Verizon locked it and refuses to unlock it. So the phone is just gonna be out of date forever, I guess!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, I caused a massive problem when I accidentally filled the drive completely, so I've been a little more conservative while I shop for a larger HDD. Thinking of getting a 20TB HDD so I don't have to have 4 different drives plugged into my computer. (I remember when my 3TB drive was considered crazy big...)

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (6 children)

That's what I was thinking! Mine is over half a TB at this point!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Honestly I constantly get home and go to take out my keys and remember like 3 pieces of trash in there...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Two-Dice Pig. So not a super complicated game, but still fun to try to leverage the... 3 point totals to calculate a risk vs desperation factor. Though looking at the code again, the hard limits feel weird. Like just straight up not allowing the risk of more than 35 points at a time (100 is a winning score, tho)? Though I do remember that I HAD to add the condition to force it to claim victory or it'd essentially get too cocky and would lose everything. I know that two-dice pig is essentially a solved game (as much as you can solve a game that relies on random chance), but I felt using a lookup table was boring, and wanted it to feel like it was actually an AI that could make mistakes, and had a semblance of a personality.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Honestly one of my most competent "AIs" (that wasn't ML) just did a whole bunch of math to calculate an optimal strategy, but to make it feel more human, I added a few other things, like how desperate it was to win this round so it could have a chance of continuing, a bit of arrogance if it was winning (it was a bit heavy in the beginning. Had to add checks for "if you've already won, submit your victory instead of becoming so arrogant you lose everything!"), and to top it all off: a random number generator that could make it pick the opposite of what it wanted to if the confidence strength wasn't high enough. Just made it a little less predictable.

Honestly made every competition against it really close. And certainly way better than the people who solved it with a simple "randomly choose an action to complete"... Which was most of the class.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I find the opposite funny, too. Tripping on a chicken and suddenly gelling like 5 "quest failed" notifications for quests I didn't even have before then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Oh you'd better not ask about mine, then :x ~~Mine retails for about $3k new.~~

Bought it barely used for a really good price.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I mean if you're ignoring the cat and saying that only the dog is important to you, then duh the cat isn't gonna like you. Shocking how much distain people have for pets that you actually have to get along with instead of them just loving you unconditionally...

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I love the two sides of "It's about the price of a cup of coffee" like they're not referring to a 30oz premium milkshake with a shot of espresso, not a regular black coffee.

Then the

"Your generation can't afford anything because of your coffee addiction!"

Like companies aren't just monetizing every single last thing and telling us "you'll own nothing and you'll LIKE IT!"

view more: next ›