Archangel1313

joined 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (14 children)

I'm pretty sure the 1st amendment nullifies this argument.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

That's a lot of fingers to count. He must have had the entire staff of the White House holding up both hands.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago (8 children)

That's not "lifesize". That's more like "half-size".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Lend him a ton of money and then threaten to collect.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well, yeah. It's called "market manipulation", and it's usually considered illegal.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

How did I not notice this before now?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, NAL, but...I'm pretty sure this violates both international law and US law.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

JFC. This "order" is written like the target audience were all at a 3rd grade reading level. They spend more time complaining about how many words were used by prior administrations to define "showerhead" than they do explaining why they have such a problem with water restrictions. How stupid do you have to be, to not understand why water conservation is important...even in places where "you have so much water, you don't know what to do with it."

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't suppose you'd be in the mood to make a few bad decisions tonight?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

...followed by even more crackdowns on whistleblowers.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago

"It was a prescient call by the president. Maybe too prescient"

It's not "prescience" when it's deliberate.

view more: ‹ prev next ›