AlolanVulpix

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Bhutila Karpoche🟧 on Bluesky

This election, the name of our riding has changed to Taiaiako'n—Parkdale—High Park.

Do you know how to pronounce it?

 

Mike Morrice🟢 on Bluesky

Thank you Lilly and Sara for your steadfast support - it means so much.

“At a time when so much of the political climate feels disconnected from reason, equity, and kindness, Mike stands apart. He leads with integrity, thoughtfulness, and a true commitment to the people he serves.He’s out there, on the ground, working alongside local organizations, tackling tough social issues, and collaborating across party lines to make real change happen. He’s been a steadfast ally in the fight against gender-based violence, a strong supporter of the 2SLGBTQIA+ community, and he’s amplified the voices of so many local champions working to address pressing community needs.Mike consistently shows up - he listens, works to find solutions, and is incredibly persistent. We’re so proud to have him as our MP in Kitchener Centre and to call him our friend.” Sara Casselman & Lilly Da Rocha

 

Cheri DiNovo🟧 on Bluesky

The Conservative Party collapsing is a resounding “No” to MAGA politics. Conservatives who support human rights and democracy finally get what that’s all about and are rejecting #MapleMaga

 

Generation Squeeze on Bluesky

This election we're calling on all parties in Canada to give us platforms not press releases and substance, not slogans. So today we're introducing our secret weapon...... Read more at: elections.gensqueeze.ca/

 

Fair Vote Canada 🗳️🍁 on Bluesky

We always hear the question of whether Conservatives can break into Toronto, but, there are already hundreds of thousands of Conservative voters there. First-past-the-post shuts them out.

Proportional representation ensures every vote counts, everywhere.

#cdnpoli #Election2025

A graphic with a red silhouette of Toronto and the text: "In the 2021 Federal Election: Over 290,000 Torontonians voting Conservative = 0 seats." Below, it reads: "Proportional Representation ensures every voice is heard in our democracy." At the bottom: "fairvote.ca".

 

PsyPhiGrad on Bluesky

If you are being compelled to vote for the Lesser Evil, please take a bit of time to help make sure that you never ever have to do that again.

#PRNow

 

Barzin on Bluesky

Every time we have an election in Canada, we need to bring up electoral reform. If we had the electoral reform that Trudeau promised but did not deliver, we'd see better representation of both left-leaning and right-leaning voices.

Canada would be better off and less politically gamed/monopolized.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Content Moderation policies

Content Moderation Policies for c/fairvote [en-CA]

details

Content Moderation Policies for c/fairvote

About Our Community

c/fairvote is a bilingual (English/French) forum dedicated to discussing electoral reform in Canada, with a focus on proportional representation. Our community welcomes everyone interested in learning about, discussing, and advocating for electoral systems that ensure every vote counts.

1. Content Focus

Encouraged Content:

  • Information about different electoral systems (FPTP, PR, MMP, STV, etc.)
  • News about electoral reform in Canada (federal, provincial, municipal)
  • Analysis of election results demonstrating electoral system effects
  • International examples and case studies of electoral systems
  • Advocacy strategies for electoral reform
  • Educational resources about voting systems
  • Discussions about democratic institutions and principles

Off-Topic Content:

  • Content unrelated to electoral systems or democratic reform
  • General partisan politics unrelated to electoral reform
  • International politics unrelated to electoral systems or democratic institutions

2. Language Policy

  • Posts and comments in either English or French are welcome
  • Translation requests are welcome but not required
  • Respectful corrections of language usage are permitted

3. Conduct Standards

Be Respectful:

  • Focus on ideas, not individuals
  • Disagree without personal attacks
  • Respect different perspectives on electoral reform

Be Factual:

  • Back claims with evidence when possible
  • Properly attribute sources and quotes
  • Avoid misrepresenting opposing positions
  • Correct mistakes when identified

Be Constructive:

  • Aim to advance understanding of electoral systems
  • Consider how your contributions help others learn
  • Offer solutions, not just criticisms
  • Engage with the strongest version of opposing arguments

4. Prohibited Content

The following are not permitted:

  • Harassment or personal attacks
  • Discriminatory content based on identity (race, gender, etc.)
  • Deliberate misinformation about electoral systems
  • Spam, repetitive posting, or flooding
  • Content that violates Canadian law
  • Calls for violence or illegal activities
  • Doxxing or sharing personal information without consent

5. Specific Content Guidelines

Partisan Discussion:

  • Discussing parties' positions on electoral reform is permitted
  • Focus on policies and principles, not partisan rivalries
  • Avoid blanket statements about voters of any political affiliation

Evidence and Claims:

  • Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
  • Link to sources when citing statistics or research
  • Be transparent about your information sources

Cross-posting:

  • Cross-posting relevant content from other communities is allowed
  • Respect original content creators and provide attribution

6. Moderation Approach

Moderation Actions May Include:

  • Removal of content that violates guidelines
  • Temporary or permanent bans for serious or repeated violations
  • Content warnings or labels on borderline content
  • Thread locking when discussions become unproductive

Progressive Enforcement:

  1. Informal reminder about guidelines
  2. Official warning
  3. Temporary restrictions
  4. Permanent removal (for serious or repeated violations)

7. Appeals Process

  • Decisions can be appealed via messaging a mod
  • Explain why you believe the moderation action was incorrect
  • Appeals will be reviewed by a different moderator than the original decision maker
  • Response to appeals within 72 hours

8. Community Input

  • Periodic review of moderation policies with community feedback
  • Transparency reports on moderation actions
  • Open discussion threads for community concerns about moderation

These policies aim to foster a productive space for learning about and advocating for proportional representation, while ensuring respectful and evidence-based discussion. Our goal is to build a community that advances understanding of electoral reform in Canada, not to restrict legitimate debate or differing perspectives.


Politiques de modération de contenu pour c/fairvote [fr-CA]

details

Politiques de modération de contenu pour c/fairvote

À propos de notre communauté

c/fairvote est un forum bilingue (anglais/français) dédié à la discussion sur la réforme électorale au Canada, avec un accent sur la représentation proportionnelle. Notre communauté accueille toute personne intéressée à apprendre, discuter et défendre des systèmes électoraux qui garantissent que chaque vote compte.

1. Orientation du contenu

Contenu encouragé :

  • Informations sur les différents systèmes électoraux (SMUT, RP, RPM, VUT, etc.)
  • Actualités sur la réforme électorale au Canada (fédéral, provincial, municipal)
  • Analyse des résultats électoraux démontrant les effets du système électoral
  • Exemples internationaux et études de cas de systèmes électoraux
  • Stratégies de plaidoyer pour la réforme électorale
  • Ressources éducatives sur les systèmes de vote
  • Discussions sur les institutions et principes démocratiques

Contenu hors sujet :

  • Contenu sans rapport avec les systèmes électoraux ou la réforme démocratique
  • Politique partisane générale sans lien avec la réforme électorale
  • Politique internationale sans rapport avec les systèmes électoraux ou les institutions démocratiques

2. Politique linguistique

  • Les publications et commentaires en anglais ou en français sont bienvenus
  • Les demandes de traduction sont bienvenues mais non obligatoires
  • Les corrections respectueuses de l'usage linguistique sont autorisées

3. Normes de conduite

Soyez respectueux :

  • Concentrez-vous sur les idées, pas sur les individus
  • Exprimez votre désaccord sans attaques personnelles
  • Respectez les différentes perspectives sur la réforme électorale

Soyez factuel :

  • Appuyez vos affirmations par des preuves lorsque possible
  • Attribuez correctement les sources et citations
  • Évitez de déformer les positions opposées
  • Corrigez les erreurs lorsqu'elles sont identifiées

Soyez constructif :

  • Visez à faire progresser la compréhension des systèmes électoraux
  • Considérez comment vos contributions aident les autres à apprendre
  • Proposez des solutions, pas seulement des critiques
  • Engagez-vous avec la version la plus solide des arguments opposés

4. Contenu interdit

Les éléments suivants ne sont pas autorisés :

  • Harcèlement ou attaques personnelles
  • Contenu discriminatoire basé sur l'identité (race, genre, etc.)
  • Désinformation délibérée sur les systèmes électoraux
  • Spam, publications répétitives ou inondation
  • Contenu qui viole la loi canadienne
  • Appels à la violence ou activités illégales
  • Divulgation d'informations personnelles sans consentement

5. Directives spécifiques de contenu

Discussion partisane :

  • La discussion sur les positions des partis concernant la réforme électorale est autorisée
  • Concentrez-vous sur les politiques et les principes, pas sur les rivalités partisanes
  • Évitez les déclarations générales sur les électeurs de toute affiliation politique

Preuves et affirmations :

  • Les affirmations extraordinaires nécessitent des preuves extraordinaires
  • Fournissez des liens vers les sources lorsque vous citez des statistiques ou des recherches
  • Soyez transparent concernant vos sources d'information

Publications croisées :

  • Le partage croisé de contenu pertinent provenant d'autres communautés est autorisé
  • Respectez les créateurs de contenu original et fournissez l'attribution

6. Approche de modération

Les actions de modération peuvent inclure :

  • Suppression de contenu qui viole les directives
  • Suspensions temporaires ou permanentes pour violations graves ou répétées
  • Avertissements ou étiquettes sur le contenu limite
  • Verrouillage de fil de discussion lorsque les discussions deviennent improductives

Application progressive :

  1. Rappel informel des directives
  2. Avertissement officiel
  3. Restrictions temporaires
  4. Suppression permanente (pour violations graves ou répétées)

7. Processus d'appel

  • Les décisions peuvent être contestées en contactant un modérateur
  • Expliquez pourquoi vous pensez que l'action de modération était incorrecte
  • Les appels seront examinés par un modérateur différent de celui qui a pris la décision initiale
  • Réponse aux appels dans les 72 heures

8. Contribution de la communauté

  • Révision périodique des politiques de modération avec rétroaction de la communauté
  • Rapports de transparence sur les actions de modération
  • Fils de discussion ouverts pour les préoccupations de la communauté concernant la modération

Ces politiques visent à favoriser un espace productif pour apprendre et défendre la représentation proportionnelle, tout en assurant une discussion respectueuse et fondée sur des preuves. Notre objectif est de construire une communauté qui fait progresser la compréhension de la réforme électorale au Canada, et non de restreindre le débat légitime ou les perspectives différentes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

we’ll need people with all sorts of different political ideologies to get onboard if we’re ever going have a shot at implementing some form of PR.

I wholeheartedly agree.

Put your comments here:

p.s. I hope we stop this childish behaviour of downvoting people we disagree with. I only down vote if I genuinely feel they are acting in bad faith (and I didn't downvote this post either).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Why stop there? Chip in some more to proportional representation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I appreciate your pragmatism, but let me approach this differently.

You're suggesting we need to work "within the boundaries of things as they are" - but that's precisely how we've been trapped in this cycle for over a century. Since 1919, generations of Canadians have made the exact same strategic calculation you're making now. The result? A democracy that's growing increasingly dysfunctional.

This isn't about ideology - it's about results. The "realistic" approach you advocate has been tried for decades and has consistently failed to deliver reform. At what point do we acknowledge that this strategy simply doesn't work?

Consider that 76% of Canadians support proportional representation. The barrier isn't popular will - it's political inertia.

Strategic voting creates a psychological trap where we're perpetually choosing "the lesser evil" while never building momentum for the change most Canadians actually want. It's like staying in an unhealthy relationship because you're afraid of being alone.

Look at countries like New Zealand that successfully transitioned to PR. They didn't get there through incremental compromise - they built momentum for real change.

I'm not asking half the population to change overnight. I'm suggesting that those who already believe in PR should vote their conscience. If even a quarter of strategic voters did this consistently, we'd create the political pressure needed for reform.

Sometimes the "realistic" path forward requires breaking old patterns that have consistently failed us. Isn't continuing to do the same thing while expecting different results the definition of insanity?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Reminder: only Green🟢/NDP🟧/Bloc⚜️/RPC🟨 consistently support proportional representation.

view more: ‹ prev next ›