5wim

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If he was a tighter it'd be a different story

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... that is there question.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can you remember the first time you felt insecure about your ability to come up with backstories? What was that like? And so on

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Would you say what you're seeking is "more intimacy," up to, potentially, the most possible intimacy?

I would suggest looking at his different interests and getting curious. If you're interested in the guy, it should be pretty easy to find reasons why this film or that game are endearingly-this-or-that in a way that makes you like and respect him even more.

Then, you bond over it; by trusting his taste (intimacy) enough to check out that show or whatever interest, you now have an opportunity to get deep (intimacy) into what you each individually felt (intimacy) about it, and maybe you felt something in common. That's some foundation for intimacy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure I only said it was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not only is "common" unfortunately not a quantitative assertion (and I disagree), many incorrect usages are "common."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_shake

As earlier stated, obviously some people might use the opposite words for a particular effect.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's just not the accepted and used English for those actions. If it was something like "rotated" then it would be ambiguous and subject to interpretation, but the word "shook" already has a meaning

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (6 children)

And their point is that they are wrong to do so.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I use tagging in Boost

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

We already went over it, I hit him so no refunds

view more: ‹ prev next ›