this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
454 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2921 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 312 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

Until there are some kind of real penalties for submitting unconstitutional legislation, we will not be able to stop these clowns from abusing our state legislatures.

[–] [email protected] 137 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Seriously I’ve said it before if you’ve backed legislation found to be blatantly unconstitutional you should be removed from office.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Until you get clowns like we have in the Supreme Court shooting down women’s healthcare rights and this too becomes weaponized against the Democrats because those rights are somehow “unconstitutional”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It really should have to pass some form of nonpartisan review before being able to be introduced. I hate that as a private citizen, I have to track possible legislation and make time during the day to tell them that it's clearly unconstitutional, have them pass it anyways, and then wait between 2-10 years for the courts to tell them (maybe).

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Informally, I believe this has been resolved by having the state attorney general sign off on most legislation as to its constitutionality. In my state, the attorney general is a shitheel. But, he has called out anti-gay legislation as blatantly unconstitutional and a waste of time and money. The lawmakers want headlines and ALEC money. They don't give two shits about it being lawful or costly or harmful.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not aware of any states where the attorney general can block introduction of legislation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

If I insinuated they could block it, that wasn't my intention. It is basically a check without teeth. They can make a stink about it and a recommendation to the governor before signing but they have no legislative power.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've been thinking along the same lines for a while. If I call 911 and submit a knowingly false report, I get charged with a crime. If I submit knowingly false paperwork to the government, I can be charged with a crime or at least infraction and fined.

But these people we elect who have entire staffs that are for making sure they always have enough information are submitting blatantly unconstitutional laws just to get them passed through a majority congress to be again and again shot down at the judicial level should really face consequences.

Though I don't know what that would be without it being used to easily punish political opponents. If there's a law that does this and gives the judiciary more power, how will it be used when conservatives control those 2 branches?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

If I call 911 and submit a knowingly false report, I get charged with a crime.

There's a long history of lynching and SWATing in America that suggests otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Until there are some kind of real penalties for submitting unconstitutional legislation

Who Watches The Watchmen?

Who gets to decide what constitutes "Unconstitutional Legislation" and dole out the penalties? The courts (stacked with conservatives)? The police (staffed with fascists)? The voters (caged until only the Republicans have a functional majority)?

At some level, this is a popular movement of the Elect. It isn't just Ron going off on a limb. He's got enormous financial and social support from other like minded white supremacists.

That's not something you can combat without an organized opposition.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, this is the danger of fascism playing with language.

They aren't trying to be logical or fair. They aren't here for debate. They're here to do what they want to do, period.

Which is why they also inevitably fall apart, (eventually) they can't even have that conversation internal to the movement and agree on what it is they want to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

The law doesn't restrict Satanism, this is just a comment Desantis made

[–] [email protected] 119 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Lawsuit time. BRB, gotta go donate to TST.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is there a market to bet on the outcomes of lawsuits? Because we have a winner.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

These days, I don't even know anymore. I've lost all faith that's what's right will be what's done

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

BRB, off to go buy some TST shirts and hoodies

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Honestly I feel like Desantis wins either way, he loves defunding his own government over vain attempts to oppress minorities.

[–] [email protected] 110 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Ron DeSantis now judges what a religion is or isn't?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago

When you're backed by a lead-fueled delusion that you know god, you can decide anything.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago

He sure as shit tries but this is 100% getting litigated

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago

He has decided...His is... Yours isn't

[–] [email protected] 104 points 7 months ago (2 children)

In the article he says "Satan has no place in our schools" but what is Christianity without Satan?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago

Same as it is without...insanity

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I don’t believe Christianity is a real religion. Do I get to ban it from my business?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My deeply held belief is that their is not now nor has their ever been any God in this reality, can churches please be removed from any street I drive down?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm cool with them having buildings, they just have to pay taxes to fund those roads because their LARPing doesn't have any backing to justify the exemption.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

They want to put a church down the block from a school, and I can't abide that sort of thing.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Imo if you pass a clearly unconstitutional law you should maybe be liable for some of the court costs.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

And any lawyers who advised you that it is a law that may stand up in court should be disbarred.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The ultimate arbiter of constitutionality is the Supreme Court. Given the current court, are you sure that's what you want?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 7 months ago (1 children)

DeSantis conveniently didn't mention Mosque leaders as teaching the kids. I wonder why that was. Does Florida not recognize Islam as a religion? Or did he just not want to point out that was a possibility...

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago

Does Florida not recognize Islam as a religion?

This is, unironically, an argument American conservatives are making

Or did he just not want to point out that was a possibility…

There's two prongs to this kind of assault. The "we're just opening the door to religion in schools" angle uses liberal egalitarianism to shoe horn in reactionary ideology. Then the "they're too dangerous to let near your kids" angle is used to pry rival ideologies away.

What you end up with is a singular "safe" educational platform that just happens to be Ron's favorite flavor of white supremacy, with any other belief categorized as a form of subversive or derogatory hate speech.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is a textbook example of the "establishment of religion" prohibited by the First Amendment.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Laws for thee not for me!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago

It's ironic because denying that Satan has followers would be considered blasphemy in many Christian denominations.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 7 months ago

Florida loves dumping tax money into Miami law offices.

I’m sure this has nothing to do with the obvious federal legal rodeo they’re creating.

Sorry FloridaMan. Hey, at least you still have huge stockpiles of hydroxychloriquine! Mmmmm-mm! Good stuff.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 7 months ago

the TST is technically a religious institute so uh. Good luck have fun.

I think the COS also is but fuck the COS the COS can eat dick.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 months ago

If you’re not the proper government mandated religion, you’re not welcome in Florida.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oooook, that's legit not something Florida can rule on. Its in direct violation of their own state constitution.

SECTION 3. Religious freedom.—There shall be no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting or penalizing the free exercise thereof. Religious freedom shall not justify practices inconsistent with public morals, peace or safety. No revenue of the state or any political subdivision or agency thereof shall ever be taken from the public treasury directly or indirectly in aid of any church, sect, or religious denomination or in aid of any sectarian institution.

If belief in God is a religion the belief in their adversary ie. Satan must also be a religion. Ie. Either both are religions or neither are.

Notably there's more evidence that by Floridas definition that Christianity isn't a religion given its support of violent prostilyzing, child rape, and incest.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago

Your religion isn’t a real science.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 7 months ago

Lol. We've tried this before, DeSantis. Courts side with Satan.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

Pastafarians, follow me!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What about the Church of the Subgenius, the Discordians, and the Pastafarians?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What about the God-Biscuit?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Leftists: try and get these jobs and teach kids liberation theology, bonus points for smuggling Marxist critique into sermons

load more comments
view more: next ›