this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
309 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59152 readers
2539 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Microsoft Looking to Use Nuclear Reactors to Power Its Data Centers::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That feeling when your society is so dysfunctional that only corporations can build much needed advanced infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Solar Panels are really cheap now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

much needed? Nuclear Power for AI?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nuclear power is not exclusively used for AI. Additionally, if they have their own power, then that frees up whatever energy they use for AI from other plants to be used for other purposes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

it still isn‘t a net gain for public infrastructure. which already lacks much needed investment.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Government doesn't build infrastructure either, it mostly just funds private companies to build it for them.

Theres a whole contract bidding process and everything

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (11 children)

That’s … actually pretty neat.

Makes a lot of sense given the amount of power needed to run a data centers like that. Definitely cleaner in the long run too.

They’ll still need backup power/generators but they’ll need a lot less of them and they’ll mostly be needed for the nuclear parts.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They could just run renewables since they already need batteries as you said.

Also i dont want incompetent people operating nuclear reactors. We saw what happened with that multiple times already and you still shouldnt eat boars in eastern Europe bc. auf radiation levels thanks to fucking Tschernobyl.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should research this a bit more because ironically more people get exposed to radiation in the coal industry than in nuclear, percentage wise. Also I live in Eastern Europe and all game is safe to eat.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Nothing compare to the radiation levels in tchernobyl and under the 1,4 billions euros sarcophage.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I take it you haven’t read the relatively new study that showed that the radiation in the animals in Eastern Europe is actually more from unregulated atomic bomb testing rather than Chernobyl.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Clippy: it looks like you are trying to prevent a nuclear meltdown….

Oh yes, what could go wrong. Windows can’t even run an advertising board without blue screening…

“The core is about to melt down! Hit the shutdown button!!” “I can’t, it’s installing updates!!!”

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Microsoft cloud runs mostly on Linux.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

It mostly runs. An Azure-optimized HyperV build is the primary hypervisor I think, but I'd wager that most customer VMs on Azure are running Linux. However, if you want to run Windows in the cloud, it's a decent option.

My experience with Azure has been less than stellar. They have good API documentation, but tooling & core compute is a bit janky. The web UI is also a throwback to a past era, but you can't really avoid it when debugging issues which you have to do often during development. Then the developers want to forget all about it ... which is a problem when something inevitably breaks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Somewhere in some timeline relatively close to ours this actually happens, the idea of 3 mile island/Chernobyl 2.0 event happening to microsofts personal reactor because a forced windows update screws over emergency override software is peak absurdist dystopia that I get chuckles from

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't think Bill Gates has any significant involvement with Microsoft these days, but wasn't he pushing for greater nucleus power usage, including trialing reactors in India?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

wasn't he pushing for greater nucleus power

You’re thinking of Gavin Belson. Nucleus was a Hooli product.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

LOL I didn't even realize I made that typo. I've been typing nucleus a lot more than nuclear lately.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He is the primary investor of TerraPower. Not sure about anything with India. They do have something that is being planned in Wyoming.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ah, thanks. I looked it up and apparently he had planned something in China but the plans were scrapped and now it's Wyoming. This is what I get for not looking it up to refresh my memory beforehand.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

He was promoting something called traveling wave reactors. Which never panned out. Just like nothing will become of this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

This would wrap up the whole story arc of Mr Robot to 1 season. Lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Somehow, the idea that a company with a safety and security issues history like Microsoft would run a nuclear reactor sounds like a very, very bad idea.

Do you remember the Aegis cruiser debacle? They didn't even manage to run a f-ing diesel engine under Windows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not the worry you should be worried about. Once they can cut the governmental power cord corporations would have exactly zero limits.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Microsoft and nuclear reactor are words that should never be in the same sentence - easy recipe for disaster

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

companies like Microsoft are always considering novel methods for powering (and cooling) their data centers

If they are near population centers, they could use the excess heat from both for remote heating.
But mostly adding a nuclear power plant to a data center will require additional cooling.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is talking about SMRs and not traditional reactors. SMRs still haven't left the prototype stage, but maybe they'll start to be useful in a decade's time, who knows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That would be a wildly optimistic timeline. And even if they managed to produce a working system by then, it would still take decades longer to scale up to the point where these things could make a meaningful contribution. That's time we simply don't have.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›