The problem is not that Ai could replace humans; the problem is that executives think they can.
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
110 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
38594 readers
530 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
One of the first things drilled into me in journalism was "Smith thinks" should be recast to "Smith said he thinks."
The C-suite is likely well aware of limitations, but shareholders like to hear about the hot new thing.
The thing is, the idea isn't wrong. Automating complex tasks is a bitch, but the repetitive tasks that turn any job into a grind are prime candidates. The larger issue is instead of letting employees spend more time doing fulfilling activities because of increased efficiency, companies tend to do layoffs.
the repetitive tasks that turn any job into a grind are prime candidates
The problem is, this varies from person to person. My team divvies (or did, I quit not too long ago) up tasks based on what different people enjoy doing more, and no executive would have any clue which repeating tasks are repetitive (in a derogatory way), and which ones are just us doing our job. I like doing network traffic analysis. My coworker likes container hardening. Both of those could be automated, but that would remove something we enjoy from each of our respective jobs.
A big move in recent AI company rhetoric is that AI will "do analyses", and people will "make decisions", but how on earth are you going to keep up the technical understanding needed to make a decision, without doing the analyses?
An AI saying, "I think this is malicious, what do you want to do?" isn't a real decision if the person answering can't verify or repudiate the analysis.
Perhaps I should have said "tedious" sted "repetitive."
Most jobs are by their nature repetitive, as how else does one acquire domain expertise? Seeing something for the first time and having question marks appear in a thought bubble is wildly different from having seen similar situations hundreds of times, solving the issue immediately and going about your day.
Some of these tasks are enjoyable -- I didn't get out of page design by choice, and by then I'd conservatively produced well above 10,000 pages -- but others are not. For me, the benchmark is "Am I actually using my brain to solve a problem, or is this just using time that could otherwise be spent doing so?"
The latter tasks are the ones I was referring to. No sane person buys a tablet of 2,000 Flushes and then proceeds to flush the toilet 2,000 times in rapid succession.
I nominate this comment as Quote of The Year.
So.. if Duolingo is just AI now, why would anyone pay for Duolingo? Just ask the AI for language lessons yourself.
That's a U-Turn
>claims to care deeply about its employees
>replaces some employees with bots
Duolingo is talking out of both sides of their mouth.
Crazy, given the company name!
Leaning hard into enshittification, I see...
The enshittification of Duolingo has already been going on for quite a while. It has really gone downhill in the last few years.
I noticed it was starting and deleted my account a few years ago.
Duolingo will be losing this customer
That's weird, because their servers can't even seem to stay up long enough for any of the ai features in their app. It's why I gave up on their max subscription because it would require doing conversations and 9 times out of 10 it would just stop listening/processing halfway through.
Okay, real talk guys. If there's one thing LLM's actually CAN do, its language and translation. The best ones are also great at context.
You sound a bit like people yelling at companies for laying off typewriter manufactures when the computer came along.
And we are in the technology community..
oh sure it's great until it confidently hallucinates something completely insane and you have no way of realizing it's gone off the rails
for this reason translations are probably the last thing generative AI should be used for, at least when it's done in a language you speak you can double check it.
It can’t self-correct, write new curriculum, etc. It’s an abyss for errors and it does not understand when you correct it. I’ve tried and watched it give me the same alternating 2 answers that I told it were both wrong. If it’s wrong, you basically have no idea. You’re putting trust in a navigator that is simply reading instructions and understanding none of them.
I’ve been in tech professionally for around 18 years and have lived through trends and changes. This is by far the worst one and the most haphazard. I’m not anti-AI (I use Copilot at work and it’s constantly wrong), but what is happening now with this AI wave is just reckless. They’re throwing it at everything because shareholders love shiny new things that make line go up.
they cant actually but it's convincing enough that you'll think it's the same, and in the process make it financially impossible for improvements to be made by actual translators.
Im curious as how it makes it finacially impossible for improvements by actual translators?
And what improvements do you mean?
if you put the people making translation possible out of work, you will run out of sources for useful translations.
LLM are not magic. They function off of human effort for thir training data. High quality data is thus, sourced from (in this case) human translators. Some can be done without them by nonprofessional texts, but it is not enough.
4 months ago I thought I'd cut some corners and instead of looking for an online Cyrillic keyboard to transliterate a simple three word phrase, I'd ask ChatGPT. it transcribed "zvezda" (звєзда, a star) as жірка ("zhirka", a frying pan). that was the first and the last time I tried using LLM to do language stuff.
The problem is that while LLMs can translate, it's still machine translation and isn't always accurate. It's also not going to just be for that. It'll be applying "AI" to everything that looks like it might vaguely fit, and it'll stifle productivity.
Not really, back then you replaced people with more people that knew how to operate "insert tech advancement of the time". Sure there were still people losing their jobs, but not so much like we're seeing with this AI bs
Trading off quality for money.
Bro every post jn Lemmy about AI carries a bandwagon full of hateful morons who don't even know why they're so angry.
Darn I was about to start using it to learn French. Any suggestions?
all language learning is just down to exposure and repetition, so just consume as much french media as you can and get some flashcard app to memorize vocabulary.
Come to france :)
My wife would not be happy if I did that
I've heard good things about Pimsleur