Umbrias

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Just going to point out: russian culture doesnt use nazi in the same way we do; largely they dont view nazis as ontologically bad because of the bigotry or the antisemitism or the genocide of many peoples, but because they were an existential threat to russia or russian ethnicities. a lot of the associations westerners have about nazis are just not widespread in russia. this is why there are a lot of seemingly idiosyncratic phrasings in this kind of stuff.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

this is an explicit design feature of federation: free association. this is one of the primary reasons it is in theory better than something centralized. this post is layers of wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

see certain optical illusions in a way that other vision models cannot.

eh… but not in a way that is really like what humans see. which is the articles claim, but it makes a clasically cs approach to nuerology: zero effort to prove the quite substantial claim.

Word soup

that is most certainly not word soup. it's also an accurate statement, though uncharitable to the authors claims.

Also, the detail in description of their "quantum" inspiration (an effect not unique to quantum mechanics in fact, at that level of description) reads like they skimmed wikipedia's intro to xyz topic, whether or not the author understands the topics more deeply.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

only if you jump to using the spokes and wheel right from the start rather than starting from the hub

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that is called a missile, not a drone. no consumer uav are doing what you are suggesting, and different uav respond to jamming in a huge variety of ways.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

neither are jerks, they simply are what they are trying to survive hostile environments best they can with what they have.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

removing unnecessary abusive misogyny != puritanism. hilariously different things in fact

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

why care that they removed it at all?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

it's a wasp, it is hungry.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

yeah they may have been the same or worse under a different housing model. or much better, but it seems plausible that this wasnt the worst outcome. a modern implementation in a wealthy society not post war would do a lot better, and probably in this specific sector be better than the market alternative.

view more: next ›