Very cool work! I read the abstract of the paper. I don't think it needs to use the "AI" buzzword because his work is already impressive and stands on its own, though, and the work has nothing to do with LLMs.
this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
97 points (90.8% liked)
Technology
69629 readers
32 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I was hoping the article tell us more about the technique he developed
The model I implemented can be used for other time domain studies in astronomy, and potentially anything else that comes in a temporal format
All I gathered from it is that it is a time-series model
My mans look like he about to be voted most likely to agent 47 a health insurance ceo
Let them live in fear.
Every day a new Einstein is born, and their life and choices are dictated by the level of wealth and opportunity they are born into.
We would see stories like this every week if wealth and opportunities were equally distributed.
I largely agree, except s/equally/equitably.
How many are hallucinations
Not every AI is an LLM
Not every algorithm is AI either.
In the actual article it says “potential” new objects so probably at least more than 1
Think of all the astronomers he put out of work. :(
Begging your pardon Sir but it's a bigass sky to search.
Anything but the fuckin' metric system...