this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
848 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4288 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It garbles advertisers' data as a result, but you must disable uBlock Origin to run it; they can't work simultaneously. I recently moved to it and, so far, am never looking back!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 32 minutes ago

I don't know, just sounds like I'd be contributing to the marketers metrics so they can show "it works". it'll only make them invest in ads more. if anyone thinks capitalists are these genius level manipulators who know how everything works I only refer to the richest person alive being the least charismatic, least knowledgable, unfuckable troglodyte who keeps making an ass of himself.

if any of these companies suffer any losses or reduced profits they'll just fire hardworking people, not one of them will turn around and say maybe the ads aren't working when you actively work to show them that it is working.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Just curious- if ads are for something illegal, couldn't this expose me to liability for theoretically "clicking" it from my IP/device? And if ads are for something unsavory ( like a "chat with local cougars" site or something similar), wouldn't they start to deliver me more such ads, thinking, wow this IP is the only one clicking every sex chat ad, send them more!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

How many websites do you browse with links to truly illegal content?

If you live in a country with truly abysmal human rights, definitely don't bother with this plugin, but in most cases you should be fine on the illegal side.

Even if somehow the website you're browsing has some super sketchy ad to buyillegaldrugshere.com or whatever, to get in trouble with the law in most civilized places you'd have to actually buy the illegal drugs, not just ping the illegal drugs IP. Especially since you can pretty easily prove to a judge that your system fetches ad links automatically and without further engagement.

Not saying it can't happen, just that it's really unlikely you would be served an ad for something so illegal just clicking on it is a liability. The literally only case I can think of coming close is CSAM, but even then, if you're regularly browsing websites that advertise CSAM, maybe find other websites to occupy your time? And I can just about guarantee any website serving CSAM ads is already doing illegal shit, so you should probably be more worried about that than an ad-click...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

I'm not sure how many ads on different sites are sketchy. I don't feel like finding out, that's why I block it. There have been plenty of reasons that all sorts of illegal stuff gets inserted on well-meaning sites, so it seems like it's inviting all sorts of trouble to automatically click stuff without consideration.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

I've used this for a while. Also, I love filling out corpo surveys because I feed them bad data. It's the little acts of chaos.

Another great extension:

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/fake-data-haterapps/

If they want real information, they can pay me, and even then, well... :) Don't work for free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Ha, this is as hilarious as it is creative. Interesting find; got any more?

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been recommending this for awhile, it's nice to see someone else take up the mantle.

Yes, it clicks ads in addition to blocking them. Google removed it from its addon repository even though it wasn't breaking any rules. They just removed it and kept it removed because there wasn't sufficient backlash, the scumbags.

It's the main reason why I use Firefox these days. it's clear that the cabal will not allow anything that legitimately threatens their power structure, and make advertising less-effective for the same price is a gut punch they need.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Automated ad clicks probably are breaking the rules, TBF.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 14 hours ago

Don't care. At this point I will take being actively malicious toward them.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

That comment is correct on so many levels...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good start. Now make a version that clicks each ad a random number of times from randomly generated IP addresses.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 day ago (23 children)

That's not how IP addresses work.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Totally doable if this was a distributed service.

ok not randomly generated, but you know

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It does if it reports the URL to click home somewhere and users can opt in to pull the list to auto click.

It would DDoS the ad servers. Muwhahahaa

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. That’s just what I want. An extension sending all ads served to me to a central location, so my fingerprint can be very easily indexed and stored on a definitely never hacked, leaked, or sold database.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

And it would totally never get abused or hit a false positive.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What if we use a Visual Basic UI to hack the IP address by netmask?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but this only works if you connect your VPN via 3 block chain proxies.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Make sure you're behind a 54mghz ram modem firewall

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (4 children)

maybe we can setup a botnet to poison advertiser data.

click all the ads, all over the planet!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ad Networks use browser fingerprinting to detect duplicate clicks, which is tied to your hardware, system locale, installed fonts etc.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Sounds like a solvable problem

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

Chameleon add-on for Firefox, randomly rotates your browser, OS, screen size, timezone, device type, language, and other customizable parameters every x minutes.

I've set it to do so every 5 minutes, and to omit desktop & tablet as device types (else some websites display the respective page) and timezones (messed up 2FA).

I also disabled blackberry and windows phone from the manufacturer ID, that would have the opposite effect from obscuring me.

For the rest of it, it's working great.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 131 points 2 days ago (11 children)

You know this is the good shit because when it first came out a few years back google was running a huge disinformation campaign against it. You'd search for "adnauseum" in google and the first result would be an article from some weird advertising company calling is "insecure" and "malware" without any actual argumentation behind those claims, while no other search engine returned that article (I lost the screenshots, so yall are just gonna have to take my word for it). They also delisted it from the chrome store for not discernible reason. They were afraid.

But nowadays I'm willing to bet that they figured out how to detect adnauseum's fake clicks and filtering it out. Stuff like that needs a talented development team to keep it up to date.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This would still make a connection to the ad servers that can then track me though.

I guess with a hardened browser and a VPN it would be alright.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

At this point I think it's better to poison the well.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I always liked using this on the premise of privacy-through-obfuscation. If the powers that be must get information from me, then i'd prefer to give them garbage information.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 90 points 2 days ago (18 children)

Google has put a lot of effort into detecting and blocking stuff like this. They call it "click fraud", if you want to look it up.

It'll just mean they start ignoring clicks from you.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Then that achieves the same goal. If they're ignoring clicks from you, and you're blocking their trackers, then they probably don't have a good profile on you, because whatever they do have is either old, poisoned, or both.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That, I guess, it’s the whole point. Stopping being tracked 🙂

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

This feels like reverse psychology on a little kid.

"That's it, I'm not tracking you anymore! >:("
"Oooh nooo, what have I done! Oh how much I would wish to be tracked :("
"No, you won't convince me to change my mind >:("
"Oh well, guess I'll have to live without being tracked, what a shame that is."

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›