this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
56 points (85.0% liked)

Canada

9385 readers
1552 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And it feels so fucking gooooood !
The β€œchoose canada” ad is just everywhere and I can't stand it anymore 😌

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Be vigilant, it's already happening here; bots and obvious state-funded trolls are in the comments.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nothing to see here, just regular Canadians enjoying cheering for the Calgary fires hockey team, voting for the conservatives and warm water ports!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I only cheer for the Edmonton Lubricators

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

And their Great Once, Wayne Getsky!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Didn't he steal a quote from a paper company owner?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, many people here are supporting genocide or war from their respective governments. I suggest tagging them as trolls, a feature which you can enable in the Voyager app

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Far better on the soul to block them outright.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

can you substantiate this?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Read the comments in the Canada community on Lemmy World.

We are talking about comments that are so obviously meant to provoke, stuff like "Your province never cared for you" instead of "man, I wish our government cared for us". This is an example of reading voice, but there are plenty of examples where the information is too well-formatted or has the signs of being crafted by an LLM.

There are lots of tells, but by now it should occur to us that Canadians are being fed one line of bs, Americans another, eu yet another. All meant to divide us and put us at each others' throats.

And at this point, it should be plain that information warfare is here to stay, so it doesn't matter who is behind it now, because it will be someone else in a year or two.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

this is speculative

edit: and non-falsifiable

double edit: interestingly, your entire line of discussion helps achieve the exact division you are proposing is the goal of the propagandists you insist are operating here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Which part is speculative?

You are trying to derive proof from "lack of proof", with which I unfortunately can't help, Senator McCarthy.

What are you trying to signal by denying my claim that there are bots and trolls among the comments?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

you are making a positive claim (propagandists are prevalent on Lemmy), but you have no proof. while, of course, an absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, what you are doing achieves the exact thing younclaim the propagandists want: creating division in our communities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Senator McCarthy

there is some high irony here, considering who is stirring up a witch hunt.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Which part is speculative

the origin and intent of the comments you don't like.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have seen accounts that haven't posted in over 2 years appear immediately after the election was called and aggressively criticise Trudeau / ape for Poilievre.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

that's not proof of anything.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

I guarantee you you can and eventually will if this platform lives on. Not to mention user propoganda is not exactly much better. Keep your brain on and don't believe any platform to be immune to garbage because they never are.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

I expelled ads in the 90s. I have no idea what ad you're talking about, and I couldn't be more pleased about it.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Here you get to see individuals acting in their own capacity to do the same, sometimes ironically and/or unintentionally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Freedom from forced propaganda

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

you weren't here for the election

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah what's up with these NDP / Jagmeet Singh posts on here lately? It's a two horse race. Jag needs to back off and stop splitting the left vote else Canada will suffer from a Conservative majority.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The Liberals are centrist, not left. They're right smack-dab in the middle of the Canadian political spectrum. The NDP and Greens are left.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The Liberals with the addition of a conservative central banker as leader, who has already thrown several progressive causes under the bus, is a big step further right than even the center-right LPC party of the last decade.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They're closer to the NDP than to the Conservatives, by my estimation and by CBC vote compass.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They are closer to the CPC than the NDP by mine. LPC will always always always side with large corporations over labourers and citizens. They do this for neoliberal ideological reasons. That is not a left wing party.

The only friends closer in Canadian politics than a Conservative PM and a Liberal Premier of Ontario are a Liberal PM and a Conservative Premier. It's just two brands of the same thing, one that hides behind affected social conservatism, and one that hides behind faux social progressiveness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They do this for neoliberal ideological reasons.

I just don't see any evidence that's true.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

lol "splitting the left". NDP is the only party ON the left.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The Greens? The Bloc?

And yes, the Liberals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The Bloc are not available for most Canadians to vote for, but yes, they are a left wing party, and we were certainly lucky for that when they were the official opposition. They help keep the window from being dragged further right than it already is.

The Greens attempt to be neither left nor right so they can be (in a gross misuse of this term) nonpartisan. I don't know about today, but earlier in their formative period, most Green candidates were ex conservative candidates of various parties who found that true conservatism was not welcome in the modern right wing. Green philosophy is very compatible with both right wing conservatism and left wing idealism.

The LPC are the biggest whores in Canada and it's just branding and shrewd exploitation of social issues that make people think otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

What are you talking about? Greens take the NDP line or further left on just about every issue.