this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2025
227 points (98.7% liked)

News

28345 readers
4002 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The patient had the organ transplanted at a hospital in Ohio in December and died in January, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson Lynn Sutfin said.

A subsequent investigation that also involved the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Ohio Department of Health determined the patient got rabies from the donated organ. Sutfin did not specify which organ was transplanted.

(page 2) 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Scrubs episode come to life.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm not sure rabies is screened in donors. Thats brutal.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For good reason, it's extremely rare.

Edit: The statistic i looked up, is less than 10 cases a year. It would be a waste of resources to test for rabies on every organ donor. But I wouldn't be surprised if they start testing now.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A quick search shows rabies testing is $80 to ~$200. Given the cost and time a transplant takes I would say testing for rabies would be insignificant. But health insurance companies are assholes so they probably would not cover the cost due to the rarity of the disease. Cheaper for them to let people die and families sue.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

That's fair, but where do you draw the line at testing for diseases? There are so many things a patient could have. I don't think its just about insurance companies.

Edit: my point is, at some point you are wasting precious time for the people who need the organs, and they might die. Testing for extremely rare disease/illnesses might even be considered irresponsible. You're getting diminishing returns testing for super rare stuff, and since there are so many things that are rare, you have to make a call about what to actually test.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Ya I get it, that would be expensive and impractical.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure it isn’t part of any normal testing. Maybe if there were symptoms in the donor that indicated rabies or their family noted they had interactions with wild animals, but typically I think it’s mostly hepatitis, HIV, syphilis, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, chagas, and west Nile that are always checked for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

you got it! I'm just wrapping up schooling for med lab so thanks for the refresher!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

"How did the organ donor die?!?!"

"Oh, rabies."

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm sure RFK's CDC will get right to the bottom of what happened here and prevent it from happening again /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More vitamin A would have saved them. /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

And methylene blue! Sure it gives you diarrhea, but its blue!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Well now I have another question to add to my list of things to discuss with the surgeon before I accept any organ transplants.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

What a horrific story

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›