this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
302 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

59030 readers
4914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 187 points 9 months ago (23 children)

I hate Tik Tok and also hate copyright disputes but can't help but smile when these big corporations have arguments over money and people start taking sides, like Tik Tok or Universal cares about any of their customers.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I’m on side “Let them fight”.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Let them cook each other

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Let them almost kill each other, then whoever is dragging themselves away from the fight go over and American History X their entire business.

I can dream....

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

that's how i am when the big media companies and the cable/satellite companies fight over fees and retransmission rights.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 120 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'll take, "Things That Won't Affect Me at All" for $400, Alex.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

HUUUUUUuuuuuuuu-guh

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Universal music owns the rights to Remember (walking in the sand) by the Shangri-las.

Oh no.

Oh no.

Oh no no no no no.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If somebody can scrap that annoying song from the internet it would be win for humanity

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The song is amazing, it’s the horrible sped up lyrics that are awful.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/V5YxtweUxrA

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If only they also owned the rights to the annoying AI voice they use too.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

God I thought I was the only one who fucking can't stand that voice. Whenever I complain about it everyone else is just so nonchalant.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

Those oh no's made me remember "Oh no you didn't" from Mercenaries 2. Had to listen to it.

Unrelated, but in wanted to complain about being reminded of the song. And now I want a Mercs 3...

[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (6 children)

this is everything awful about the modern internet. i hate that they can just go and retroactively destroy creations like this. imagine if someone lost the rights to a song and they forced you to send the cassette back

[–] [email protected] 24 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don't use TikTok, do creators buy music fron TikTok to put in videos?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago

No, the music overlay music offered in the app is licensed and can be added. Creators who are performing covers, I believe, generally have the license held by TikTok or have their videos muted/taken offline. Special arrangements are made for intentional or encouraged content . That is a guess, but things like Megan Trainor’s “Gucci” where she is both the original artist and a participant would be a case like this. I would think Grace Kelly and sing alongs on arrangement-bound copyright material like Pentatonix doing public domain carols (or even Roger’s and Hammerstein) are negotiated licensing if outside of their pre-negotiated license.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No, they just put it as background music in their videos, but didn't actually pay for it. I would guess it constitutes fair use?

[–] [email protected] 53 points 9 months ago

Luckily, copyright law is based on guesses!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fair use is context based. There is no simple yes or no answer.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (2 children)

In this case there is. Background music is not fair use.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago

Copyright and ip laws are so fucked in favor of rent-seeking megacorps who hold their hands out expectantly for shit someone else created decades ago.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Does it mean that all of existing tiktoks with universal's music will now be silent or is it only going to affect new videos?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 9 months ago

God it would be great for a huge back catalog of tiktok videos to just be lame tweens dancing in silence.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

It impacts all videos. People are going to get a shock tomorrow when they realize they don't own any of those videos they took when they can no longer download them back with sound.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Wouldn't all those cringe lip syncs count as fair use under parody?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Probably not, the internet seems to think that fair use is much broader than it actually is in practice. The use of copyright materials to produce a work which relies entirely on those materials is not covered when no editorial value is created by the second work. Lipsyncing isn’t parody, essentially.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A lot of people on the internet don't realize how much content is plain copyright infringement that simply doesn't get pursued. Memes, fanart, edits, covers, so forth.

Personally I think that should be reason to rethink how IP law is written, if the average person doesn't find so many uses infringing and they have become part of the typical cultural habits. But that hasn't happened.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You could make that argument, but the users would need to get the unedited songs from a legitimate source first. Tiktok wouldn't be able to provide them directly without infringing copyright.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

I hope not for the sake of society

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Good, Tiktok has tiktokified enough brains by now.

Let the brains restore and get used to longer form content.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah!

swipes through Lemmy shitposts for the next three hours as my last two brain cells cry out in pain

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

UM is almost the sole reason why copyright claims on youtube are such a hellscape, so I'll gladly enjoy seeing them fight TikTok on this.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand. Isn't TikTok a video making platform? What catalogue...?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 9 months ago (1 children)

TikTok was originally an app called Musically where people would lip-sync over songs. Music was/is the core of the app so copyrighting songs would cut down the majority of their content.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

There are estimates of this impacting between a few hundred million to a billion videos...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Controversial take but...

Yes, tiktok has several serious glaring issues as a platform but being such an absolutely huge platform, it has been (for a while now) much more than teen dance app. It's a platform that under represented and minority groups have found an audience to share their voice. The are legit journalists, artists, celebrities, organizations, dank memers, etc using the platform for good.

Obv it would be great if it wasn't all on tiktok (isn't there a federated equivalent?) but seeing people rejoice wherever something bad happens to the platform just lacks... nuance I guess. I know it's hard to compare social media platforms, but from what I can tell it's one of the less controlling, censor heavy platforms. And it's not owned by Elon Musk lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›