this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
1205 points (99.7% liked)

politics

22131 readers
3981 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez condemned Donald Trump and Elon Musk at a packed Arizona rally, accusing them of harming working-class Americans and promoting oligarchy.

Sanders denounced corporate CEOs as “major criminals” exploiting workers, while Ocasio-Cortez called for stronger Democratic leadership.

Rallygoers urged Ocasio-Cortez to challenge Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer after he supported a Republican funding bill.

The rally, part of Sanders' “Stop Oligarchy” tour, follows criticism of the Democratic Party’s weak response to Trump’s agenda and features further events in Colorado and Arizona.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 38 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I was there. It was awesome seeing so many people. I prefer Mutualism over Democratic Socialism, but like AOC said there, "no matter if you disagree with me on a few things, if you are willing to fight for someone you don’t know, you are welcome here."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I've even been telling my friend group that now's not the year to criticize tankies so long as they're fighting fascists

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I'll oppose authoritarianism no matter what the flavor is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

Sure, and absolutely, but like, threat assessment

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Been watching an Infographics Show video on YouTube about Mao Tse Tung's horrible consequences, but the thing was that he resembled Trump MUCH MORE than he did Bernie.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really hope this "AOC takes over the Democratic Party and saves America" arc has a happy ending

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (13 children)

She's a young, outspoken woman of color. Old white people would never let it happen, even if half are in a nursing home mainlining Fox News straight into their frontal cortex and can barely walk on their own.

A lot of folk are still recovering from Obama being elected twice.

At least Bernie looks familiar to them, so the hatred will be tampered.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Actually the groups that swung the election for Trump were young men (HUGE swing), and immigrants (despite voting against their own interests and pulling the ladder up behind them for future immigration).

Senior men were more likely to vote for Kamala than young men.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

We gotta figure out how to De-Tate people

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Not really. There wasn't a huge swing of people switching from Democrats or independents to vote for Trump. Those target groups just decided not to vote. In other words, it's not like more people are relating to Trump's messages, but it's people not relating with either's message and feeling apathetic. This is why Trump bashing isn't helping. There needs to be genuine improvement of the Democratic party itself.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›