this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
254 points (98.5% liked)

politics

21970 readers
3721 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 hours ago

[Trump wrote] “The necessary Pardoning Documents were not explained to, or approved by, Biden.”

"Not explained to."

Dipshit is really telling on himself here that actually reading an EO didn't even occur to him, he relies on others to dumb them down for him.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

By his logic, we could treat Trump's pardons as 'void and vacant' as well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

This isn't a country of law and order anymore. Laws only apply when Trump wants them to apply. There is no logic beyond that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Laws have only ever applied when someone is willing and able to enforce them.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What, are you suggesting that our virile Supreme Leader, renowned for his stamina and attention span, didn’t sign all 1,600 J6 pardons by hand?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

I believe our strong, virile leader spent all their waking hours signing those 3,300 J6 pardons while big, strong men stood their with tears rolling down their cheeks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

His aren't signed by a pen at all and could easily be fraudulent because of it. Think about it, an 8bit graphic is much easier to copy than 32bit.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is another one of those ‘scary and must riot’ thresholds. The presidential pardon powers are absolute. If he attempts to dismantle this… much like dismantling the 1st Amendment that he has already begun to do… rioting and articles of impeachment should have already begun.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

I hope he executes Hunter Biden in the street so libs wake the fuck up :)

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, I’m not really sure presidential pardons should even exist, but they do, and it’s a problem that Trump is trying to get around them to persecute the opposition party.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Presidential pardons most definitely should NOT exist. But also, F Trump.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, someone willing to abuse pardons that wantonly is never meant to become President in the first place. The Electoral College was supposed to be one protection against that, but obviously that has been a massive failure.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

The Electoral College was supposed to be one protection against that

Instead, it only enabled it!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

This is another one of those ‘scary and must riot’ thresholds.

Americans are known to miss that boat. Remember when Americans rioted over the 1985 MOVE bombing in Philadelphia when they dropped bombs on the city and let blocks burn? Or that time when Americans rioted over the police and government firebombing Tulsa? Or that time Americans rioted over the people who caused the '08 financial crisis not receiving justice?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Inb4 Trump starts issuing executive orders with "constitutional amendments".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Need more riots with guns please

[–] [email protected] 107 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Ridiculous. A man who breaks laws and violates the constitution daily calling out his predecessor for using the wrong kind of pen while attempting to protect people from persecution. If there were a functioning justice system this would be dismissed out of hand.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My concern here is whether anyone is actually going to stand up to him. He's clearly flagging that he's going to go after these people and it's going to be dependent on whether the DOJ actually pushes back or not.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

it’s going to be dependent on whether the DOJ actually pushes back or not.

Lmao.

As if that's even a question. He picked who he picked for exactly this kind of thing. There will be no pushback.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Good news is, Pam Bondi is dirt cheap. It only takes $25k for her to drop investigations!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Expecting the courts to save US democracy? How's that been working so far?

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago

after autopen controversy

There go the media again implicitly giving credence to Trump's nonsense. There was no "autopen controversy" except Trump making this groundless assertion. They make it sound like he's responding to a real controversy.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate when articles like this use words like controversy. There is no controversy when someone just makes up that a standard thing is now an issue.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

That's the Fox model. Have your talking head invent visit on the morning program, have them debate it on the afternoon program, then have the evening program report on the controversy.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sounds like a sovereign citizen “where’s the wet ink signature?” kind of complaint.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 day ago

It's not a complaint. It's a pretense and excuse to persecute people he doesn't like.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Man I am getting so tired of saying “I fucking told you so” to so many people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ha, says the guy who wants to make things declassified by his thoughts alone.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Well, he's not in prison for treason or anything related to classified documents being mishandled, soooooooo.......

Rule of law means nothing in the US anymore unless you're poor. If it mattered, we would have had different presidential candidates from the start.

If anyone still cares in the government, none of them care enough to actually do anything but stand by and watch. Maybe give a half-hearted "yeah way to take a stand" after the fact when someone gets dragged out of the room by the fascists.

Excellent domain name for your instance, by the way. Absolutely horrifying in just the right way.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If this sticks, then maybe the next democrat in office can reverse all of the Jan 6 pardons?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is wishful thinking. The democrats have never responded in kind to republicans breaking precedent. If there's any lesson to be learned from the 2024 election, it is that democrats hold "precedent", "decorum", and "mature pragmatism" to be more important than winning (or quelling fascism).

It's the same wishful thinking as people who were saying "Biden could use the new presidential inmunity SCOTUS ruling to legally assassinate trump!"

Understand that both democrats and republicans are driving us off a cliff.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Yep - I’m not going to hold my breath to see those people held accountable.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

He’s also trying to draw attention away from the illegal deportations they did over the weekend.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In fact, every law that wasn't written by hand with an ink-dipped quill is illegitimate! The magic spells won't work if we don't follow the rituals exactly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

All of these statements read of sovereign citizen crud.

See many posts here: [email protected]

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They've been signaling this for a week on r/conservative

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If they want to disqualify for being mentally incompetent, then all of Trump's and at least half of Regan's terms are also void.

I also love that dipshit who still can't even admit that Biden won the election.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can keep pretending things go back to the way they were after trump. I've given up on that illusion. Do yourself a favor and realize now that trump will not freely cede power.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

I said elsewhere on this post that this is a pretty clear indication he doesn't expect there to ever be another president

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The irony of them calling Biden a "President Puppet" when we all know Trump is a poorly disguised Russian Puppet

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

And the vacation thing when Trump spent 1/3 of his first term on the golf course

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

Making it even more clear that he never expects there to be another president.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

Something here is "void and vacant" to be sure, but it isn't Biden's pardons.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Last week, the group challenged the legitimacy of the orders signed by Biden claiming that an “autopen signature” was used across almost “every document” it could find.

However, a Fox News examination of President Donald Trump’s executive orders during his first and second administrations found “the signatures were also the same.” Twenty-five of Trump's signatures on the Federal Register’s website from across both terms also found signature matched, according to a separate analysis by the Daily Mail.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

The king declares.....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

So is trump now able to attack biden's family as well as everyone who tried to investigate and prosecute trumps own crimes?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

They're exposing the constitution of for the flawed document that it is

Sorry, trying to be positive

load more comments
view more: next ›