this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1223 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

70214 readers
27 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Arr, matey.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

He's afraid of losing his little empire.

OpenAI also had no clue on recreation the happy little accident that gave them chatGPT3. That's mostly because their whole thing was using a simple model and brute forcing it with more data, more power, more nodes and then even more data and power until it produced results.

As expected, this isn't sustainable. It's beyond the point of decreasing returns. But Sam here has no idea on how to fix that with much better models so goes back to the one thing he knows: more data needed, just one more terabyte bro, ignore the copyright!

And now he's blaming the Chinese into forcing him to use even more data.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Please, let it be over. Idiotic "ai"....

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Over in the US, that's giving China the advantage in AI development. Won't happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Ip should solely be with the creator and not the corporation that owns that creator. A lot of problems in stems is IP held hostage by the corporations and by publishing companies of research papers

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think the answer is there just do what deepseek did.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Do you promise?!?!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Many of you are completely two-faced on copyright laws.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Are they listening to themselves?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yes, please.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

chatgpt is stagnant, the newest model was lackluster despite using way more resources and costing a shitload of cash, Altman is floundering and on his way out he’s going to try do some lobbying bullshit

Copyright is bullshit and honestly if it disappeared it would help small creators more than anything but openai is not a small creator and guaranteed they will lobby for only huge corps like them to get such an exception. You and I will still get sued to shit by disney or whoever for daring to make $500 off of a shitty project that used some sample or something while meta and openai get free reign to steal the entirety of humanity’s creative output with no recompense

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

🏴‍☠️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Race over, eh? Welp, see ya later!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

He means development of AI in public view is over. Governments will continue without regard for copyright protections until we are all dead.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›