this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
35 points (94.9% liked)

PC Gaming

9729 readers
892 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 49 minutes ago

While this doesn't mean RDNA 4 GPUs will cease to function with legacy firmware, AMD offers no assurance.

Nothingburger, actual news would be it ONLY works on UEFI.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense; UEFI is the standard now, and maintaining backwards compatibility is expensive. I can't see a reason why someone would need to use a latest gen AMD card on a non-UEFI system.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Jeff Geerling would like to have a word with you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe it's time for arm boards to actually support their trash. UEFI itself supports arm.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Is there even a board with a modern PCI port with a non-UEFI BIOS?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Maybe. What is the cutoff?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Say it with me, "UEFI isn't inherently bad." I'm more pissed that they are skimping out on the VRAM.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

would you have prefered they paid more for bleeding edge 3gb gddr stacks and put 24gb when only a subset would actually need it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes absolutely, but the markup on VRAM is already insane. We're not talking about a huge price difference here. Even if their $600 card now costs $670, they'd get a lot of sales just by setting themselves apart from NVIDIA, especially for those interested in running AI models locally. I know plenty of people buying Macs now just cause of AI spending $3000+ or more. NVIDIA & AMD have a duopoly though, so if one says they're not going to do something then the other doesn't have a strong incentive to either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

if you're interested in running local AI models, that market should be looking at the strix halo desktops. that was basically 80% of the marketing framework did for its framework desktop.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

I’d prefer they offered it as an overpriced premium SKU for those of us who can’t say no to 4k.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

Hasn’t that been the case for a while now? The RX5700 I bought in like 2019 only worked in UEFI systems.