this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
396 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

69287 readers
3 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"There's no way to get there without a breakthrough," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said, arguing that AI will soon need even more energy.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is probably why he's invested so much into Helion Energy, who are trying to make a small and cheap nuclear fusion reactor.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

make a small and cheap nuclear fusion reactor

Aneutronic fusion isn't happening on this planet. We don't even have the fuel for it. It's a dumb thing to market when we can't even break even on D-T fusion and turning the neutrons into heat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It blows my mind honestly. This is such a young technology that commercialization at this point seems ridiculous

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I’m too much of an optimist to say that we’ll never figure out viable fusion power, I do think you’re more right than wrong.

Fission power is essentially us discharging a fusion battery, where the battery was charged by a supernova. We don’t get any free help with fusion, and we have to replicate input energies only seen in nature with stellar amounts of gravitational mass. It is (IMO) an important area of research, but I don’t expect it to power our cities in my lifetime.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, but what they're marketing specifically is aneutronic fusion. That's helium fusion, which has never been demonstrated outside of a star. Hydrogen fusion, which we haven't actually achieved much with beyond bombs is more managable. The difference is hydrogen fusion creates a big neutron flux, which needs to be isolated (the small part) and creates waste by neutron activating whatever it's around (the cheap part, volume wise hydrogen fusion creates more radioactive waste than fission but it's much easier to manage low level waste).

It doesn't help that the helium is a primordial resource that has literally escaped the crust of our planet and floated out into space. Supposedly the moon has more.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Man, if only there was some sort of energy source that is not only green and renewable, but also outputs a ton of energy rather efficiently…

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Put them more and more taxes. They will stop for sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Finally some scifi bullshit he is spewing might actually lead to a good outcome

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›