this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
836 points (98.7% liked)

World News

41185 readers
3091 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump is pushing for softer language on Russia’s war in Ukraine, straining G7 unity.

Officials say the U.S. is blocking references to "Russian aggression" and prefers calling it the "Ukraine conflict."

This shift follows Trump's peace talks with Putin that excluded Ukraine's President Zelensky, whom Trump later called a "dictator."

The change in rhetoric contrasts with Biden-era support for Ukraine and threatens a unified G7 stance.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 days ago

Russia Loving Republicans. Trump is a Russian asset. Treat the US government like an enemy.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

I love it when you talk dirty

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 days ago (3 children)

G6 it is then. After NATOTWO is set up

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Also maybe EUaC (EU and Canada)? 🥹

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe since it's mostly just the northeast Atlantic now, it should be NEATO.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago (20 children)

But I couldn't vote for Harris because that was a vote for genocide.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Coming from a country with ranked voting and more than 2 parties, this looks so ridiculous. It's like the USA electoral system is designed to make people bicker amongst themselves about who is the lesser evil, while oligarchs take control.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Yeah that was some really really stupid shit people were saying.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, most Americans do fall for things pretty easily when all they have to do is literally nothing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Someone take that orange fuck out, please.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Biggest disappointment in the last year was that dufus missing his big fat head from only 150yds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Let Trump and Putin have a G1.5. Do it. Make him look like a Russian stooge.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago

What do you mean "look like"?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›