this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
44 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38078 readers
106 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

It is disinformation to promote the idea that any of the people or corporations mentioned in this article were ever "climate advocates" and there is no reason we should continue to promote outlets that engage in this rhetoric.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

(Feeds article into an AI document summarisation tool)

Summary: Because money.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Because of insatiable greed, aka gold sickness aka "profit motive" of capitalism

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

The purpose of a company is to make money.

By selling out they stand to make even more money.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Previously there was an obvious cap on the value proposition to scaling data centers, mainly, that they needed population centers nearby who would need storage or processing for thin film devices. Latency is important for these kinds of things, so they need to be near to the demands

Now they think they can make value regardless of demand from local population, through training weights for models, or running models and sending the output to population centers. So suddenly the cost of power to run the systems is what matters, and the most profitable (not the cheapest or most efficient) is fossil fuel.

They see dollar signs with the opportunity to turn power directly in to value without the need for people nearby.

It’ll be really embarrassing for them as the consumer market continues to fail to show interest in the outputs they’re making.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Insert SpongeBob clip of Mr. Krabs saying "MONIE!"