this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
110 points (98.2% liked)

World News

40571 readers
2243 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated that restoring Ukraine’s pre-2014 borders is “unrealistic,” signaling a shift in U.S. policy toward negotiated settlements.

Speaking at NATO headquarters, he argued that pursuing full territorial recovery would prolong the war and emphasized the need for security guarantees without NATO membership or U.S. troops in Ukraine.

Hegseth outlined Trump’s approach of reducing Russian war funding through increased U.S. energy production while shifting more military support responsibility to Europe.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Agreed! Ukraine should keep all that Russian land they conquered.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Trump is all about shifting defense responsibility onto Europe but isn’t it the case that the US proactively claimed responsibility for defense of virtually every sphere where it has interests? We have the largest military in the world by FAR and bases everywhere, and have allowed others to spend less on defense because we want to be the ones with the big stick. It’s a little ironic for Trump to complain that everyone has allowed us to pursue this policy we have been driving for decades.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Lol sorry, every nation in Europe is a sovereign entity and is responsible for the safety of their citizens and the integrity of their borders.

Poland made the decision to arm itself and has been spending for years. Lack of investment in the military is fundamentally a national decision to divert money into other programs or tax cuts.

The US has been becoming less and less interested in the rules based order we built after WW2 for the last 20 years.

Many people have predicted this would happen. You have only yourselves to blame.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I don't like what you said but sadly it is true - we should have invested much more in the defence and start permanent sanctions on Russia since Chechnya war.

That doesn't distract from the fact that Trump is a cunt working hand in hand with Putler.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 12 hours ago

I'm surprised he can say anything with Putin's dick that far down his throat.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

"Putin's puppet administration says NATO should cede everything to Putin, news at 11."

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Trump knows the proxy war in Ukraine is lost. The Ukrainians had their civil war, and the whole time one side was receiving weapons from NATO and the other side was receiving weapons from Russia. In the end they were unable to come to a unifying agreement, despite multiple peace talks.

Finally, Russia invaded directly and the Ukrainian side receiving their support disappeared from the news. Since Russia invaded we’ve been given this narrative that Putin wants territory, but it’s that side in Ukraine’s civil war that is leading its people to join Russia. They felt that was the better deal and would rather have security than reunify with the other half.

Ukraine is only shrinking because the NATO-backed side started the civil war. These are the consequences of refusing to allow the democratic process to play out. The NATO-backed side lost an election and then initiated a coup in 2014, kickstarting the destruction of their country. Fuck around, find out.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Oh great, another Putinbot spouting reams of misinformation.

Trying to clean up the whole mess from your firehose of bullshit is a fool's errand, but here are a couple counterpoints for the benefit of anyone not already familiar with the relevant history:

  1. The war in Ukraine was not "civil." It was being waged against Russian troops acting as "separatists," a disguise so thin that the only ones to buy it were on Russian state TV.

  2. Every single escalation in the conflict was by Russia, ever since the hostile takeover of Crimea.

  3. The military strength of Russia compared to NATO is so ridiculously lopsided that the only way Russia could possibly "win" is if they're able to sabotage NATO from the inside, for instance by manipulating foreign elections enough to put a Russian puppet in charge.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

By 2013, it was clear that Ukraine’s democratic facade was crumbling. [...] The Party of Regions controlled the Cabinet, the Parliament (Verkhovna Rada), and most local councils. Its leading [financial-political groups] also controlled most of the courts, the police, the tax administration, and major state-owned industrial companies—in other words, the lion’s share of the economy.

https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2016/02/a-decisive-turn-risks-for-ukrainian-democracy-after-the-euromaidan?lang=en

Doesn't look much like a healthy democracy to me.

And the 2014 coup being backed by Western powers appears to me to merely be a Kremlin talking point. Do you have any reliable source to backup that claim?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Russia has been waging imperialistic wars against its neighbours since way before Ukraine.

It will also continue to do so, since it managed to fuck up its economy so bad it can't get back from a war economy.

Also, if anything this would still be a NATO victory even if it's not a total Ukrainian victory. Russian military stockpiles are fucked, Europe is bringing back NATO with new funding, better cooperation and key new members.

We've got NATO lake and the Moskva is still sunk. Wonder how long it will take to rebuild it. Sanctions are not going anywhere either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Europe is having energy problems. Germany especially is seeing its manufacturing capacity decline due to high energy costs. Before Russia intervened directly and the US forced Europe to enact sanctions, they were receiving gas from Russia at a discount and they were paying in Euros. Now they buy expensive LNG from Norway and the USA. They’ve replaced cheap energy with expensive energy.

If NATO hadn’t backed the coup to kick off the Ukraine war, Germany’s car manufacturing would be growing into the EV market instead of shrinking and hobbled. Old allies can’t catch a break.

New NATO countries are finding out that the US can’t afford vassal states like it used to. The Trump administration expects each country to pay for NATO military expenditures. Military budgets are increasing, and countries are trading financial sense to be allies with a declining American empire.

Meanwhile Russia is part of BRICS, an economic bloc that includes more than half the world’s population. And what is Trump’s response? Trump wants to go to war against the biggest economic bloc in world history. Trying to fight half the world in an economic war sounds like a losing strategy if I’ve ever heard one.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

The problem is - while he might not be wrong, simply because it’s unlikely that Russia would accept a total territorial loss at the negotiation table - ceding anything to the Russian imperialists is an invitation to keep pushing.

The truth is that the US of course do not care about the Ukraine as a sovereign entity. They care only about maintaining their own geopolitical interests.

On the other hand do I doubt that Russia is interested in merely maintaining their territorial gains - maybe as a special zone of some sort - if that would mean that the Ukraine would pursue a proper membership in NATO.

So what we will likely see is that Russia will want to maintain or increase their presence in eastern Ukraine, maintain Crimea and want assurances that Ukraine will remain a neutral buffer state.

Leading to the Ukraine being screwed over either way.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's just "Ukraine". "The Ukraine" implies that it's a territory and not the name of an independent country.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Technically it’s both, given the etymology of the word. Just as you say ‘The United States of America’ or ‘The Republic of Congo’.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Except it's not like that. "The Ukraine" is how it was referred to when it was part of Russia. "Ukraine" is correct.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 hours ago

You might want to look up the historic usage. And I don’t mean the slavic etymology nor soviet russia. It has been named both until the article became a politicized matter. So if you want to object to me accidentially implying I would not affirm the independence of Ukraine as a country, then I understand that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They care only about maintaining their own geopolitical interests.

That used to be the case. Now the US only cares about whatever Trump wants, AKA whatever Putin told him he wants.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Any time anyone says something like OP did, I imagine them in front of a whiteboard trying to explain to themselves how the US of today is the same US as last month.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Russia may want a pause of several years to allow Ukraine’s arms support relationships with the West to expire, whereupon it would attack again, this time informed by everything that went wrong in this recent war.

I dunno. Maybe? It’s just a thought.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

They won't expire, there is a literal brand new Rheinmetall factory in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Along with geopolitical interests, the US is interested in Ukraine’s natural resources.

https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/09/16/senator-lindsey-graham-ukraine-trillion-minerals/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

If the US is not helping, they should fuck all the way off.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Damn the US sure seems impotent and weak these days if they can't even restore boundaries from just ten years ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

They just lost the cold war.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 14 hours ago

~~Pete Hegseth~~ Putin tells NATO...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

What was his BAC at the time?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

At this point in his miserable attempt at a life, his alcohol has no blood...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Oh come on, if you're going to shake UA down for 500B in rare earths the least you can do is a li'l reacharound while fucking them in the ass. Stay classy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

You'd think Zekensky would give him that amount in relation to the amount of land liberated.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

What his opinion after he loosens up with a gallon of vodka or 2?