this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2025
455 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19857 readers
3321 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warned that Trump’s mass deportation policy could lead to labor shortages and higher grocery prices.

Experts say agriculture, construction, and healthcare will be hardest hit, with farm output losses estimated between $30 and $60 billion.

Deportations could cost the U.S. economy up to $88 billion annually.

AOC argued that immigrant labor is vital to economic stability, urging Congress to pursue immigration reform.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -3 points 24 minutes ago (1 children)

I understand higher food prices is rough for the general public, but I'm struggling to find a reason we shouldnt deport illegal immigrants. I'm concerned that illegal immigrant labor is akin to H1b or prison labor, where the worker has diminished rights and is abused more than other groups.

Why are democrats or people in general in favor of illegal immigration?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago)

You know what a "false dichotomy" is? If no, this is a beautiful example. Immigration reform is an entire world of options, "deport all the brown people" and "open borders and free subsidized piñatas for everyone" aren't the only options like you're presenting here.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (11 children)

Farms are just going to take it on the chin. They're losing their labor with the mass deportations and they're losing a hilariously large buyer of food with USAID being shut down.

So who's ready for the new price on food?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

And they'll blame Democrats. And the Democratic Party won't combat the misinformation because they suck at messaging.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

IMHO, Democrats have gotten much better with their messaging over the past decade. People just don't pay attention because diligently solving problems with substantial plans that take years to show effects isn't sexy or exciting.

I stay pretty keyed in to what's going on in congress, but I have to put effort into that. It seems like all the algorithms constantly want to shift my content to paying attention to all the crazy shit the GOP is up to and I'm constantly catching and stopping myself from getting sucked into rage porn.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 49 minutes ago

People just don’t pay attention because diligently solving problems with substantial plans that take years to show effects isn’t sexy or exciting.

Yeah maybe... But they're also so bad at even just pointing out the horrible shit Republicans are constantly doing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 36 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

They are OK at messaging, it's just for people only consume conservative propaganda, because dems has to be bounded by truth, and cons can say whatever they want, and truth is just isn't as exciting

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 minutes ago

Yup. I can see that one a mile out.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 240 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I know she’s been villainized by the right, but I feel like, at this point, she needs to be elevated to key leadership of the party. She’s the only one who seems to be able to speak to specifics. I just listened to Jeffries on Jon Stewart’s podcast and it was all of the same old generalities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Seriously. They all said they felt better than before but the dude barely said anything worthwhile. So disappointing it's the exact same hand wringing bullshit where they say "we just need to get the message out" instead of actually doing shit differently. Jon really did try to get more out of him but he stayed on message like 80% of the time like a true politician.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago

I just listened to Jeffries on Jon Stewart’s podcast and it was all of the same old generalities.

Especially after Stewart's recent interview with her.

[–] [email protected] 156 points 1 day ago (18 children)

I can't speak to every politician, but as a class, they seem to be elites that are disconnected from the average American.

AOC, having been a normal person, is able to bring the message that gets through to people without having it filtered through some sort of communication agency.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Would be a great time for bernie and AOC to make strides to start a new party, or other tactics to force dems to move left.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I hope they pass a bill to set age and term limits, alongside with voting reforms. Our political system was built for a mere 13 colonies that shared a coastline, not a continental civilization without telecommunication.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 20 minutes ago

Those could be good ideas, although I dont like the idea of forcing out good candidates based on term limits.

I'm more concerned with fixing things like citizens united:

"In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that any laws that try to restrict the political spending of corporations and unions is a violation of the First Amendment’s right of free speech. This significantly impacted campaign finance laws."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Term limits bring their own set of issues. I would do some more research on the subject before championing them.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago

Given how clearly she's stood up since day 1 here, I wouldn't be surprised if she's the first target for Trump's Window-Pushing Squad

Sooner or later, the idiot is gonna take the biggest chapter from Putin's book.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

I fear for her safety, to be honest...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

that's exactly why the establishment limits her movements. she's a threat to schumer and pelosi's stranglehold on the money pipelines. what schumer and pelosi either don't realize, or don't care about, is they're who the ultraradical right want dead first. they showed us as much on january 6th, 2021

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Tariffs too. It's just a bit of "short term pain"...meaning, for about 4 years until someone comes in and reverses the horrible policies.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago

The consequences of trump will have residual effects. The damage cannot be undone in one fell swoop. The country is a big boat and it takes a long fucking time to change directions even if you immediately start steering it the other way.

Then there's the whole topic of friends and allies wondering if we can be trusted in the long term. Why make deals with us if we're gonna just elect a stupid asshole who will reneg on anything and everything that isn't immediately beneficial to that specific person? A lot of countries likely considered drastic changes to policy with us, but decided to hold off until the 2020 election, and then breathed a sigh of relief when we didn't reelect the dipshit. Fast forward four short years and see that we went back to the dipshit despite all obvious, available information saying that only a fucking moron who is trying to summon the end of the world would allow such a thing; would you trust a country that elected trump, took a break from him, and then elected him back in again? This really isn't about lackluster democrats and their performance in elections; would you want to make long term plans with a person who was so chaotic? Denmark won't forget us openly considering taking Greenland by force. Panama won't forget us talking about taking the canal. Canada won't forget us talking about annexing them. The EU won't forget the tariffs. Mexico won't forget the deportations. We're alienating ourselves, burning through all of our political capital like trump burns through every business venture. He will fuck every relationship up and the dollar will be fucking worthless as a result if he doesn't just fucking stop.

I legitimately have zero clue what the country and the world in general look like four years from now, but I can tell you that it will be bad and the bleeding will take years to stop and decades to heal. Even if this stopped today, Pandora's box is open. If trump died on the toilet today, vance would continue what's happening.

The entire line of succession isn't even the problem. The experiment is over. Oligarchs and their pet autocrat run everything and they're not interested in what you have to say about it. If they decide to just suspend all elections and appoint all elected offices and consolidate all power to the executive, what can really be done to stop it? It would take a revolution, but the bastard cops have fucking tanks with which to kill us all. No other country will come to help us because our military is far more advanced than all others and we're geographically very easy to defend. Our own country has us by the balls and the twisting is just getting started.

I wish I could be so optimistic as to believe that things could be okay in four years. A lot of people will be deported and/or killed before then, so even if it did end up being okay for you or me, that's still gonna be too late for them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago

"If" someone reverses those policies. There are still policies created by Trump from 2016 that have not been reversed.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 23 hours ago

Private prisons looking at the 13th amendment:

“I wouldn’t say deported… More like, under new management.”

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah another page in the orange manual of america's destruction

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely they mean shocked by how affordable eggs are now, right??

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (7 children)

How much could an egg cost? 10 dollars?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›