this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
952 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19885 readers
3103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denied claims that she is secretly wealthy, stating she is worth less than $500,000 and doesn’t trade stocks or take corporate money.

Her financial disclosures show modest savings and student debt.

Some conservatives on X, despite opposing her politics, praised her perceived integrity.

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

That's a crazy amount of money. I've never had even 10% of that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

Dawg I wish 500k was a crazy amount of money with how expensive everything is these days

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago

It's about what you'd expect honestly since she's been making $174k per year for a decent length of time now.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

There is one group of people who both share the ire of most people and deserve it: The ultra rich.

I've had rednecks tell me they disagreed with Bernie on a lot but they liked how he hated billionaires. Ben Shapiro's gaggle of yes-men gave him grief for criticizing Luigi.

If votes count for anything anymore a smart, effective political party would be able to capitalize on this universal hatred.

Sadly, we have the Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, that's a large part of Trump's original appeal, right? So many people on both sides agree there's rampant corruption in the government and politicians and billionaires getting too rich off it - and Trump promised an answer. And why his current wreckage of government still has many conservatives approving: they believe he is answering, kind of.

Now, if you could get Sanders and AOC to start a new party...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

And why his current wreckage of government still has many conservatives approving: they believe he is answering, kind of.

Now, if only we can get them to see that he's got people in his orbit at billionaire techbros who think they're all going to be John Galt, and that the "capitalist utopia" he builds in Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" is what they're trying to build and it won't be good for them. They think they're all going to live in their own Galt's Gulch when it's going to be more like Andrew Ryan's Rapture.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I love AOC. I'd vote for her in a heartbeat in primary and general elections. Now, whether she makes it to the general depends on the DNC, and I have no faith that the political consultant/establishment class will let anything remotely progressive through. No money to be made.

I guess the only way forward would be to vote for her in the primaries to such a degree that the Dems have not choice but to confirm her through.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

She needs to win a senate seat first. I think schumer should retire, and she should run for the seat. If she can win, we can see how many red districts went for her.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago

Dems have no choice but to confirm her through.

That was the Bernie plan in 2016 & 2020 during the primaries. Clinton had the support of the established Democratic party and with superdelegates Clinton took a commanding lead. Similar situation with Biden, most dropped out before Super Tuesday and endorsed him.

Now both of these instances could be considered "smart politics". If you've got the political maneuvering to win the primary, then maybe you've got the same maneuvering to win the general.

It didn't work out for Clinton. It did work out for Biden.

When we look at our most recent election, it's clear there was a little bit more of a rift, but Harris was chosen and there was no primary.

Now, some of this is simplified and there is plenty to argue. But suffice to say we can't just vote for AOC "so much" that she'll win. I don't see the Democratic party supporting her.

Now it's too early to talk about 2028 realistically and a lot can change between now and then, but if she were running today she'd have my vote.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Or, get so much grassroots activism going that you can start a new party for her.

You might go a round of everyone flaming, "nooo! You have to support Dems or Repbs will win!!1!" But if enough people try a vote for your new party, next time it might have a chance.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

She doesn’t have to start a new party. The left side of the dems should just use The Tea Party and MAGA playbook. They co-opted the GOP by pushing out Republican incumbents in local elections first. A shitton of money from the far-right went to these smaller elections. Then they moved on up and replaced Republican state senators. They created enough momentum that Trump became a viable candidate.

Push enough incumbents out and the Democrats have to take the left seriously. Plus it will normalize left wing rhetoric and policies among the populace. Screaming “cOmmUniSm” won’t work anymore when the people have seen these policies being implemented in their own communities.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

Maybe my experience is biased but I don't think shouting communism works as well as it used to anyways. Plenty of young people will hear "Communist? Then I'll vote for her!" And the old people are getting exhausted with political hyperbole - "Communist? Yeah like every liberal what else is new."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So, how many decades will this take, and where are we gonna get this shitton of money?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The tea party did it in two Obama terms. And the money has to come from the public. Starting a viable third party isn’t going to be easier or cheaper.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Taking over an existing party would probably be easier.

The green party is currently a shell designed to launder foreign influence in US elections. But there ain't a lot of green party members, and fewer still vote in their party's primaries. Compared to getting the Democratic party to move in a direction other than right or starting an entire new party from scratch, stealing the green party might be doable. Time it right and you can even make russia waste time, money, and effort trying to keep it.

And it's not like Democrats are ever going to hold honest primaries again.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the internet manifest:

1- blame her for having millions due to kickbacks

2- when she proves that her net worth is less than 500K make fun of her for having too little money

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's many things that expose the Right Wing Grift.

When AOC was first elected they mocked her for being a Bartender who "rose above her station"

What more proof do you need that the American Dream is bullshit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

When it's a teacher - she reminds me of that mean lady who failed me

When it's a doctor - they're pushing a vaxxer agenda

When it's an engineer - he'll be a bad negotiator

When it's a scientist - we've gotta do what? No thanks.

When it's a lawyer - ah perfect they make everything better

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

They call at that because you'd have to be asleep to believe it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean if you take the internet as a monolith, you'll find contradictions every where. Some people will hate A because of B, some people will hate A because of C, but either way A is getting hate for both B and C.

So either there are millions of people online with different opinions but the crowd looks the same, or there is one very, very busy troll who is running all the accounts.

~help I'm so tired they won't give me a break to pee~

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 37 minutes ago) (1 children)

One busy troll? What makes you think it is just one person? Maybe if it was the 1990's you might have had a single troll per social platform but we are way past that point. A real troll would even be considered high quality with so many bot accounts nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

The trolls are the people who watch cable news

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

~help I'm so tired they won't give me a break to pee~

Look at this loser here trying to take credit for the entire internet that I write every day. SMH. FWIW @meep_launcher is allowed to pee whenever they want, they just want sympathy. And they write almost nothing of the Troll Monolith, mostly just sitting back and drinking too much coffee while I do all the hard work with about sixteen different keyboards in front of me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Median property value in DC is $705,000.

She's likely living paycheck to paycheck as a sitting member of Congress. I like it.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Finally, some actual representation.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago

Shes so goddamn normal it's jarring

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The pot accuses a bottle of milk of looking black

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (12 children)

AOC is a prodigious fundraiser with a significant national following. She might only have a half-million in the bank, but her name and her reputation are worth orders of magnitude more.

Conservatives have a hard time believing someone like that isn't getting rich quick on $AOCCoin or LeftyBear merch offerings.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Gaslight

Obstruct

Project <-- we are here

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Comfortable but not extravagantly wealthy from ~~bribes~~ lobbying. I'm okay with this.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly 500k net in the DC area is low if anything.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago

It's probably low in any metro area in 2025, sadly.

load more comments
view more: next ›