this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
292 points (81.2% liked)

linuxmemes

21393 readers
1244 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] [email protected] 112 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Wayland is not killing smaller distributions. Who even came up with that batshit crazy idea?

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Killing is overly dramatic, but it's putting a burden on certain projects if they want to convert to it and not all have the resources to tank it. I don't see Window Maker porting their toolkit to Wayland, for instance.

    But XWayland exists so I don't see what's the fuss.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 101 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Flatpak is good for diversity. Users don't need to worry about whether the obscure distro they want to use has the software they want in its repos. If a distro supports flatpak it will work with most popular software out of the box.

    [–] [email protected] 34 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Plus, developers can create their own repositories that can then be used on any distro.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 73 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

    X11 is already dead, and it will not become more or less usable it will always stay the way it's and wayland will get better. that's the difference and flatpak is just an option it doesn't try to replace what's already availible. spreading distrust and misinformation about these softwares doesn't help

    [–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    X11 is already dead

    How do you mean that? I've been using X11 for like 17 years. i3 uses X11, and I will most likely not use another WM if I can help it. It's perfect for me. X11 is available in the core repositories of all the big distros.

    Curious to know what you mean by "dead".

    [–] [email protected] 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    by dead I mean abandonware, not devoloped for anymore

    [–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Just because they don't do full releases doesn't mean it isn't developed anymore. They switched to updating modules individually, with three updates made this month. Doesn't sound very abandoned to me.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    It's on life support but it is doomed.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    It is not getting new features anymore. Just because the distro is packaging it doesn't mean it's not dead.

    I heard Sway is very similar to i3. But I'm partial to hyprland myself

    load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 62 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Wayland reduces bugs and standardizes the desktop, and flatpak makes it easier for distros to include apps without going through the process of packaging them.

    This post is FUD bullshit, Wayland and Flatpak are making it easier to run an indie distro.

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

    I've been using Wayland for a while, and I've seen more bugs with my WMs than in my ~1000 hours of Deep Rock Galactic playtime

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

    Reduces bugs 🤣

    Adding 10 bugs to your apps for every bug removed from the display manager

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 50 points 10 months ago (17 children)

    There are pros and cons.

    Total centralization of the Linux Eco system isn't good for anyone. But total fragmentation where there's a million different distros that can all do basically the same thing isn't good either.

    Wayland and Flatpak are great projects though. Love seeing them get more adoption.

    load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 45 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    People complaining about something opensource not doing what they want it to do: dudes/dudettes, if you want to maintain X11, go right ahead. Or if you want it maintained, pay somebody to do it. But stop this incessant whining about opensource devs choosing a direction you don't like and pretending it's the end of the world. This isn't some faceless, megacorp with closed-source shit you have no control over.

    If all the people complaining about wayland either put their energy to positive stuff like making wayland better or making X11 better, this wouldn't be a problem.

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Distros should be free to evolve and fill any amd every niche. Let the rivers of life flow.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Wayland is so much better than X. You don't have to use it but its simplicity means most of the Linux community is going to.

    [–] [email protected] 23 points 10 months ago (22 children)

    What’s so much better about Wayland than X? I mean, I’m not really a fan of X and the security nightmare that it is, but as a user it’s all pretty plug and play these days. What does a normal user get out of Wayland? Would they even know they’re using it?

    I’d love to try it, but it currently won’t work with some software I use, so I haven’t bothered… And honestly I’m kind of confused about how everybody is talking about how amazing Wayland is (and how it seems to suddenly be the one true path for a bunch of distros) when my only experience with Wayland is people talking about how great it is and then not being able to screenshare or whatever… Which doesn’t make it seem great from the outside? That maybe sounds a bit flippant, but I genuinely don’t understand why “normal” people are so excited? I mean, I can see people caring about features like HDR and maybe that’s easier to build into Wayland than ancient X11, but I’d be more excited about the specific feature than Wayland itself which may make implementing these things easier?

    [–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (22 children)

    Wayland cuts out all of the dead features and allows content to be drawn to the screen more directly. This means that there is a simplified architecture with great battery life.

    load more comments (22 replies)
    load more comments (21 replies)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Flatpak doesn't conform to the XDG home directory, and that upsets me. Also we have an ongoing dispute between SI and IEC units on their GitHub. But I like it otherwise.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    The way the flatpak devs responded to the xdg base dir request made me not ever going to use flatpak again, fuck them.

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
    [–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)
    [–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Oh, no, it's Patrick (tingping). He is very stubborn and doesn't listen to reason. https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/5504

    I really wished that he didn't participate in the XDG problem, but he did. Then the IEC issue is probably also be screwed in the end.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

    I suddenly have the urge to daily drive Hannah Montana Linux

    [–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    Flatpak packages still suck at integration without breaking something in the core app. They're really great for bleeding edge and cross distro support tho.

    Wayland still can't do all the cool tricks X11 can, so it's not like it's really being forced upon anyone beyond X11 losing on potential major updates which is unlikely.

    DEs are willing to switch to Wayland given that it is either equal or superior to X11 which is still not the case for several scenarios and applications.

    [–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Exactly my POV. Do all the things X11 can, and I have no problem switching whatsoever.

    Why did no one had any issues switching from PulseAudio to PipeWire? Because it was simply better. It could do everything PulseAudio could, plus a lot more. It was backwards compatible (with plugins of course) and there were practically very little issues with it at the point at which distros and users decided to switch. It was a finished product.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    To devils advocate a little in general with this topic: For wider spread adoption, Linux kinda needs to adopt around more standards. If you put yourself in the shoes of the average windows or Mac (even iOS/Android) user; it's an overall standardized experience.

    Linux now, is mostly a choice of DE and package manager. I still absolutely want distros like arch and Gentoo to still exists as they are.

    [–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    Windows and Mac don't have standards; they're single solitary stand alone monoliths. The user experience is the same in their walled gardens because they are the same, not because those systems embrace standards. In particular Microsoft's lack of standards has been a point of pain for Linux and FOSS users for decades. Linux has actual standards and that is exactly why there is so much diversity. That diversity would have crumbled into chaos long ago if the Linux community did not embrace standards.

    load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Man...we've been saying that since '99...

    I mean it has gotten a lot better. Dependency hell is mostly a thing of the past. If you were around back then using it then you should know the suffering we all went through to get ANY sort of usability out of it. Half the time it wouldn't even fucking work at all due to some weird hardware you had, or you were limited to terminal only because XFree86 didn't know what to make of your video card (it was a time of cheap shitbox Pentium MMX/Pentium II/Celeron machines, some of which came in cow print boxes). It sure has come a long way from my perspective.

    [–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Ok, but nobody explained what the equivalent of "ssh -X" was supposed to be with wayland.

    [–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I don't mind Wayland but I sure hope flatpack will not become the default way to distribute packages. Most packages I tried so far didn't work. I just avoid it now.

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    That's strange? I've never come across a single broken Flatpak across multiple computers with Linux installed. Do you have examples of broken Flatpaks?

    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly anything that doesn't get ported to wayland is probably old enough that it doesn't really make sense to use as your primary desktop anyway. The most niche DE I regularly use is NsCDE, but it's entirely FVWM scripts and FVWM is planning on adding wayland support. It'll be a little sad to lose things like Trinity, WindowMaker, and Afterstep, but they were never amazing anyway and either way I doubt X will actually be unusable for a long time still.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

    More like "Wayland is getting killed by my Nvidia card"

    [–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Honestly if you care about Linux don't buy Nvidia at this point.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago

    My problem with it is honestly just a personal thing...

    My current laptop uses an Nvidia GPU.... i don't think i need to say more

    load more comments
    view more: next ›