this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
53 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

60017 readers
3473 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
53
Google cut manager and VP roles by 10% in its efficiency push, CEO Sundar Pichai said in an internal meeting (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 6 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Disable JavaScript, to bypass paywall.

  1. Install NoScript browser addon.
  2. Disable using native Chrome site settings.
  • Sundar Pichai said Google cut manager, director, and VP roles by 10% as part of an efficiency drive.
  • Google has sought to boost efficiency by reducing layers and reorganizing teams.
  • The company has been facing challenges from OpenAI and other AI rivals.
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago

Imagine they did this that way: „hey Bob, I’ve some good and some bad news for you. The good one fist: you got promoted to Manager/VP/Whatever. The bad one: in order to make the company more efficient we’re letting go of some higher staff. So, you’re fired. Pack your stuff and fuck off until 12pm, manager Bob!“

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago

ooooh, cut the CEO roles by 10% next

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Archive

I wonder what the process was for choosing specifically 10%. Why not 8.7%? Or 13.9%? Surely an efficiency drive would have some sort of structured/analytical approach to it?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

After an engineer is there long enough, they’re likely to become a manager. They’re way more expensive to keep around. Google wants to lay them off and churn them for college grads. Looks better for PR if they say it’s an “efficiency push” rather than “we don’t like to retain employees because it’s expensive.” So this was definitely an arbitrary number

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

To be fair, it's totally possible that they just have too much management. Then you get into a case where a very large portion of everyone's job is endlessly trying to keep in any with various management and you end up with too many managers competing for not enough work which makes the environment more political

[–] [email protected] 1 points 42 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

Certainly possible, and I’ve definitely been a part of orgs with just too much management, but I’m wary of Google saying that, considering how many products they kill every year. I’m sure there would certainly be space for their employees to expand horizontally if their product lineup wasn’t so volatile

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 hours ago

Some nerd probably wanted to be able to say they literally decimated their management teams

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 hours ago

Sounds good to investors

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Or even 200% ¯\_(ツ)_/¯