This is exactly why I don't store my passwords as giant metal 3D cutouts of letter shapes
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
232 points (97.5% liked)
Privacy
31871 readers
421 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I need to stop but it’s just so convenient.
but how else can you remember them
I don't even know any of my passwords
The tech to scan objects in a room using WiFi is not new. It's very unsettling.
I spy, with my little wifi...
And here I am thinking that hanging my passwords on the wall as art was hack proof. I guess it's time to redecorate.
You just need to write it smaller than the Wi-Fi wavelength (~~about 60 nm~~) and you should be fine. If someone wants to read it, they have to use smaller wavelengths (i.e. higher frequencies), which means there’s a good chance that they will be blocked by your walls.
Edit: c/2.4 GHz ≈ 125 mm I took the first value from Wikipedia, without thinking about it enough.
I think your fag packet calculation has got a power of ten wrong somewhere. Wi-fi is GHz so that would be on the order of centimetres I think.
Yes. Wifi is 2.4 GHz, speed of light is 0.3 Gm/s. Therefore one wavelength is 0.3/2.4 m/s/Hz = 12.5 cm
Or 0.001 football pitches
Yeah, you’re right. Writing it smaller than 12.5 cm should do it, which is entirely reasonable.
What if I use an awesome font like Comic Sans and round the faces like party balloons? Still visible?
It’s all about the size. You can’t use an optical microscope to look at details smaller than the wavelength of visible light. You need an electron microscope for that. Similarly, a wifi camera can’t see details smaller that the wavelength.
If you made a camera that can see in 100 MHz radio waves, you could probably see mountains, rivers and houses, but anything smaller than 3 m would be nothing but blur.
Lucius Fox hates this
This is super creepy
"baby i can read letters through walls"
the letters
Are there ways to design a room or things to put in a room (or the walls?) that would inhibit this ability?
I suppose lead shields or something...
No need. If you skim the article, you'll see it only works on sharp edges. The letters being read here are metal cutouts.
Note to self: "decorate with crystal balls..." Got it!
Lemmy is so damn salty. All you did was explain what was said in the article and some guy disliked your comment lmao
Yeah, but it was only one person. No big deal.
There he iiiiis
Faraday cage?
No need for lead. Just make something similar to those microwave door mesh plates and embed it in with the insulation.
Well, if it's using WiFi, then anything you do will also kill your WiFi signal. So, bare minimum, no WiFi router, only LAN lines.
Yeah sure why not.
