this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
635 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59217 readers
3308 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The way I read the article, the "worth millions" is the sum of the ransom demand.

The funny part is that the exploit is in the "smart" contract, ya know the thing that the blockchain keeps secure by forbidding any updates or patches.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 136 points 10 months ago (14 children)

No one is gonna buy any NFTs for millions lmao

[–] [email protected] 32 points 10 months ago (5 children)

As crazy as it sounds, some people do.

[–] [email protected] 76 points 10 months ago (49 children)

They did. For like a week last year. Then everyone realized it was a scam.

load more comments (49 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (26 children)

It's a great way to launder money.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

They're priced like police drug busts.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Sounds like a great way to make an insurance claim on a bunch of NFTs worth "millions" that you could not convince anyone to buy.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What insurance company is dumb enough to insure NFTs?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Ones that think they can't be stolen

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'd say more likely to be able to declare a capital loss on taxes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 10 months ago

Accurate headline:

Millions of dollars lost as NFTs worth a total of $0 stolen

[–] [email protected] 57 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Let me get this straight, you can steal an nft but you can't own an nft?

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (10 children)

You wouldn't download an NFT...

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

You very much do own an NFT you purchase, what you don't own is the asset the NFT represents (the shitty RNG generated monkey for example).

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I never had a jpeg stolen from me.

What a time to be alive.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No no, they stole the link to a jpeg, careful you will make them angry

Here, take my link to get a feeling

https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/db03eae9-a3a9-42df-8cf2-f2aa8bfa2d95.webp

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Another interpretation is that it's all an insurance scam were something worthless is "stolen by hackers" and then claimed to be worth millions for the insurance claim.

But surely nobody in the "well known as impeccably honest" NFT world would ever do something like that!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

I guess the millions are in the transaction fees

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Think of it like this, when people make drug busts and they find huge amounts of cocaine or whatever and they say oh this is 300 something mod a million is worth of stuff. No it's not. It's maybe like not even half that not even a quarter of that, they just make it up just to make their bust even bigger

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I remember it used to be calculated on the lowest value extrapolated out so a gram of smoke was 20/25 bucks so a kilo of smoke "had a street value of 20,000 - 25,000."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago

"Potential losses". I get the feeling that NFT owners got bit by the same bug that bit RIAA executives.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

ITT: a handful of people starting to sweat about their NFT retirement strategy

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago

One of the great thing about the AI revolution is that since generating infinite number of unique random (and commonly, bad) pictures of literally anything you can think of takes only seconds, the entire concept of NFT has become completely worthless as it completely destroyed the value-from-scarcity argument. Not that it ever was a good argument to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How do you steal a hyperlink to a jpeg

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

I'm having difficulty with the word "worth". It appears to be doing an awful lot of heavy lifting

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just because the suckers that bought them paid millions doesn't mean that the NFTs are worth millions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

…Been a minute since I’ve seen this fark headline meme.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Must be a real old-head if you know what fark is. ^me^ ^too^

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›