this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
325 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19050 readers
3663 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Imagine Magoos if Jack Dorsey was campaigning for Obama or Biden back when he owned Twitter... They would be absolutely losing their shit. Fox news would be running stories 24/7 about it and biased media influence...

They piss me off to no end. Hypocrite, thy name is MAGA.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 42 minutes ago

Imagine Magoos if Jack Dorsey was campaigning for Obama or Biden back when he owned Twitter…

and then stole a @handle to promote them as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Trump went on Fox News to talk about how he's going to ask Murdoch to not run any negative ads till the election. 🤮

[–] [email protected] 99 points 6 hours ago (12 children)

"The last thing I would do is trust a computer program," says the owner of a car company developing self driving & rocket company building automation into rocket launches.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

That's why you're supposed to have paper backups. And you audit things.

Edit: I think you could even get a real time audit and still be electronic with backups

  1. You go to machine and vote
  2. It prints off a copy of what you voted and records it (this is the primary vote count)
  3. You verify the paper ballot print off and take it to a second area to be recorded and kept for audits.
  4. Put ballot in second machine which validates and counts the vote and externally shows a counter increase on the machine for votes counted (not who) so you also know this machine counted it for a total.

So now you have the proper vote tallies from 1. The audit of the correct amount of total records from 4. If there's any cause for concern or for auditing, you can manually count the paper ballots.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 hours ago

not to mention brain chips. Remember, every accusation is a confession with the MAGA crowd. I bet we'd find a few gems in the code for tesla and twitter now

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

Software that killed a pedestrian recently.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 78 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like dominion should sue musk too

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago

They've been very effective at it. I wonder if that's becoming a good revenue stream.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 hours ago

“The last thing I would do is trust a computer program”

What a weird thing to say from someone that sells a car he says will eventually drive itself.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Friendly reminder that an Immigrant African American Welfare Queen, with numerous baby mommas and children he don’t even talk to, is a foreign actor attempting to sway American Elections by spreading fake news. Truly the enemy within that needs to be addressed, there is a reason he travels with as many as 20 bodyguards just to touch grass Source.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
  • Children that won't talk to him.
[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago

He has one child who rarely talks to him. The others are in communication.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

“The probability that a homicidal maniac will try to kill you is proportionate to how many homicidal maniacs hear your name,” he said. “So they hear my name a lot — I’m like, ‘OK, I’m on the list,’ you know.”

this makes it sound like high profile assassinations are caused by a bunch of “maniacs” pulling names out of hats

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

He watched the documentaries about The Jerk and The Terminator.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 104 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Didn't Dominion already win at least one defamation lawsuit because some jackass was spewing these lies? Gonna love seeing Elmo have to pay up, just a shame it won't cost him enough to make him shut the fuck up.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Fox News settled for $787 million.

I would love to see Musk go down like that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He could, sadly, do that a few dozen times and still be ok.

We need to eat the rich.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 24 minutes ago

Well having to find that much liquidity that fast can be a problem even for someone as rich as Musk, no?

If I own musk stock I would consider selling before he dumps $1B worth of stock on the market, and try to pick it up again cheaply. I can see it wipe out massive market cap from his companies...

[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Cost Tucker Carlson his job.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

that's ok, he works for putin now

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago

Well I guess on paper now

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't know, if they manage to get a judgment against him for a couple billion dollars, that's like 10% of his worth after he tanked Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

Yeah but at that value its still going to hurt.

Especially if he keeps doing it.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 9 hours ago

Ohh please let this be actionable a la Fox News

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 hours ago (9 children)

It's like nobody is even trying to kill him.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It should be fully legal to kill billionaires

[–] [email protected] 30 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

At some point of extreme wealth, you get declared a dragon and it should be perfectly fine to organize adventuring parties to attempt to slay you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 hours ago

I saw a comment a while ago where someone calculated the equivalent wealth of fictional dragons (e.g. by estimating the dimensions of Smaug's vast gold trove in The Hobbit) and determined that real billionaires are far worse hoarders of money. Like 1000x worse.

I should try to find that comment again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Okay but if I fond a magic ring that turns me invisible im fucking keeping it, its mines mines precious!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Ah . . maybe I'd better hold onto that . . .

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Sue him for 99.5% of his net worth that should shut this cunt up

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

101%

He'll just pull himself up by the boot straps and billionaire work ethic

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago

Bankrupt his ass

load more comments
view more: next ›