this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
169 points (98.8% liked)

Fuck AI

1291 readers
447 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

The funny thing about these kinds of assholes is they don't realize that they're at risk.

Because if I had the technical chops, I'd totally try to hack these kinds of devices to hunt down techbrodudes and slaughter them.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley companies yet again deciding if they should involve themselves in affairs they have no business being a part of. Where the fuck is Congress?? Oh right, eating out of these fuckers’ platinum assholes.

There’s obviously no way this could ever go wrong, Silicon Valley companies always make decisions based on what’s ethically and morally best for everyone, so I’m sure they’ll make the right call.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Don't be evil... Oh wait...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

We could make more... Money...

[–] [email protected] 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Tech bros: "But what if AI could have a little murder rampage, as a treat?"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago

Tech CEOs are privileged people who will do what ever and say what ever to make lots of money.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

SV: No, that would be unethical.

Armies: But we'll give you lots of money.

SV: Oh, yes then.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Don’t be evil.

Billions of dollars later.

Ok, do be evil.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I love the idea of a fancy autocomplete trained on Reddit and 4-chan deciding whether or not someone should be murdered or not. Sounds like a fantastic idea.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Hmm, who would be on the list?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago

“Obviously not… but, then again… money…

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

At long last we've created killer drones from the cautionary short film "Slaughterbots".

Of course, given how jank what we've decided to call "AI" is if you tried to make a real Slaughterbot it'd probably be blowing up random people or patches of the wall that it thought looked like a face.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Speaking of things that are deadly, that mullet/soul patch combo in the preview is rough

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Yea were seriously considering what some dude that looks like that thinks about weapons?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

fully autonomous

How about 'what the fuck is wrong with you?'

Tech bros reinvent the button smh

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

Do not create the Torment Nexus.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It’s time to get those parts to build an EMP.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Someone make a project called OpenEMP quickly so we save r&d time

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Sure they are going to allow it for the reason that they will gain more money

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

This is fucking sick

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

If it decides tech bros and billionaires are legitimate targets, sure.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

They want autonomous weapons and they want AGI to save us from climate change. I don't believe AGI will happen but they'll probably settle for faking something that fools the masses and lets them set the agenda. Then it's flame throwing robot dogs for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

"What's a viable business model for all these idiot robots we keep building?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Silicon Valley has no word in this. It's givernments who decide what kind of weapons they want for their militaries.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 days ago

Silicon Valley has lobbying money

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Stupid looking goon should be the one to go first

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

It already is

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Implement Asimov's 3(4) Laws of Robotics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Hack one of that automated turrets and change the promp sounds pretty easy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Eventually? Maybe, but frankly Asimov had those rules for a reason. Now? It can't even decide what it said a second ago.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The current discussions of LLM and algorithmic learning being referred to as "Artificial Intelligence", is super duper frustrating to all us science fiction fans. There is no AI in the Asmiov sense, no one is even trying to make that form of AI.

Having said all that, and this is the coldest take ever. Robots shouldn't kill people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

At best, LLMs are a small slice of a pie that would constitute an artificial intelligence.

I suppose you could look at this 2 ways: either, when we talk about the state of AI, we could say that, yes, we have it, but only this one small part that kinda works ok; or (the more traditional route) would be to say that AI doesn’t exist until all of the constituent technologies have been both developed and assembled.

Obviously, we know which one the marketing departments of many companies choose.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Doesn’t matter because AI will be weaponized against the masses no matter what your opinion of it is. It’s the billionaires with the money and influence to make sure it becomes a weapon and they will 100% be beneficiaries of said weapons so OF FUCKING COURSE they will use it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Ok so just imagine this guy doing a TED presentation ala Weyland in the first Alien reboot movie, and just splice that as the intro to the first Terminator movie.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The answer is no. But of course some idiot is going to do it and make the thing able to self replicate and fuel from "biomass".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

ha ha ha, no way a farrow plague upon your house

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

I remember that show, maybe I should pick it back up