this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
101 points (97.2% liked)

News

23287 readers
3699 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The owner of the shuttered Three Mile Island nuclear plant is pursuing a $1.6 billion federal loan guarantee to help finance its plan to restart the Pennsylvania facility and sell the electricity to Microsoft to power data centers, according to details of the application shared with The Washington Post. Get a curated selection of 10 of our best stories in your inbox every weekend.

The taxpayer-backed loan could give Microsoft and Three Mile Island owner Constellation Energy a major boost in their unprecedented bid to steer all the power from a U.S. nuclear plant to a single company.

Microsoft, which declined to comment on the bid for a loan guarantee, is among the large tech companies scouring the nation for zero-emissions power as they seek to build data centers. It is among the leaders in the global competition to dominate the field of artificial intelligence, which consumes enormous amounts of electricity.

...

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (4 children)

if microsoft wants the power, they can pay for it. up front, and entirely. including assuming liability for when something goes wrong, and for the ongoing storage of waste materials and the eventual decommission/clean-up of the site.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Three mile island has operated for decades safely. It closes in 2019 IIRC due to it being unprofitable, because methane was so cheap. Safety isn't an issue.

Storage of waste is very simple. It requires a very small area, and most of the waste will be neutral in a very short period of time. The stuff that isn't is still easy to store safely. We have plenty of solutions available for this. It's also a non-issue.

Regardless, I agree they need to pay for the cost. If the electricity isn't going to the people then the people shouldn't be paying for it. Unless M$ is providing the AI garbage free of charge to the public then they get nothing out of it, and even then it would be of debatable utility.

Edit: After reading this, I'm actually not that upset. The company is valued at $80 billion apparently. There's very little chance they default on the loan. It's not like they're getting the money for free. They're just getting a loan from the Energy Department. Still, if it's only for private use then the loan should be handled through private entities. They should go take the loan the banks offer. The only reason they're taking this one instead is because it's a better deal. They don't deserve a better deal if it isn't in the public interest.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

Like fucking clockwork. Bend over, here it comes again.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

No see that would go against big techs plan to increase their value tenfold on the back of taxpayers because "we need it". Fuck these guys

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

That's not at all how it works. Micro$oft paid a LOT for those congresscritters, precisely so they DON'T have to pay for it. We do. We always do.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 month ago

Do not give them one penny.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sick of all this corporate welfare

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm just concerned that if we don't give them the money they'll make windows 11 worse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Linux time!

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago

As a former resident of Washington, fuck that noise.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you get a paywall, a paywall-free link is here: https://archive.ph/hoaIs

My take on this story: dragging this reactor out of mothballs is expensive and risky, and operating at 50+ year old reactor is risky. The company that owns admits it isn't even solvent enough to run it, much less ensure the risks of operating it. Microsoft and the 3 Mile Island owner are basically asking for a multi-billion-dollar taxpayer subsidy for an enterprise—so-called AI—that eliminates jobs and is used more for revenge porn and deepfakes than it is for any societal good. This is a bad deal.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago

How about, 'no'?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

...no. Sincerely, a taxpayer P.S. have you considered budgeting and not paying for expensive coffee to pay for your expensive hobby?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So they can have an exclusive deal giving Microsoft power?

I'm pretty sure they're going to make enough money doing that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Nonono, you don’t get it! Microsoft is a small, low-profit business that we absolutely need to help protect cuz SoCiEtY NeEdS tHeM.

(Okay so there’s probably some military/national security angle they will push to justify it. And then bill us exorbitantly for that ai tool anyhow)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

sure! I'll make the check out to, "eat shit and die inc", and for the amount of "fuck you".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I didn’t read the article but I’m for any safe use of nuclear energy. Bringing an old reactor online might be significantly easier than building a new one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's just easier because they would have to build a new reactor to modern standards, which are safer than anything built in the sixties.