AI can be such a great tool, but they just use it for this crap... We need regulation
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
125 points (94.3% liked)
Technology
58142 readers
4341 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Unfortunately our government is full of 80 year olds who we don't want regulating it because it will be what the corporate lobbyist want and us average Americans don't want that.
Sadly you're right. We at least need the basic rule of labeling content that used AI
I don't understand what the purpose of regulation would be.
If a company writes bad articles using AI, they will lose business and the problem will be self correcting.
"Self correcting" have you tried googling anything lately? It's all AI generated bullshit in the first pages now
Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers
It's on the title.
....what??
You want regulation that disallows businesses to use technology that the rest of us have access to? What an odd, small view on the matter.
If you don't like companies using AI, then boycott thier products. Don't cry for big government to save you from the walls that you think are closing in around you, because they aren't.
Cant tell if it's AI written or not? Then why should it matter?? I can see a legal basis for requiring disclosure however, on an intellectual property basis, as AI content can not be claimed as IP.
In this case, the magazine created fake journalists with fake bios and used them.in the bylines. I would think that's a kind of fraud and definitely hurts the magazine's trustworthiness. The article goes into other publications that have also used fake journalists with their bylines in AI produced articles. I think if they were more transparent- say, labeling an article "AI created content" - it wouldn't be as much of an issue.
This also doesn't address errors in the AI produced articles (which could be solved by having a real life fair checker or editor).
What a funny way of telling us you didn't read the article.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
And even more strangely, his profile photo on Sports Illustrated is for sale on a website that sells AI-generated headshots, where he's described as "neutral white young-adult male with short brown hair and blue eyes."
Ortiz isn't the only AI-generated author published by Sports Illustrated, according to a person involved with the creation of the content who asked to be kept anonymous to protect them from professional repercussions.
On its review section's title page, for instance, the site still proudly flaunts the expertise of AI-generated contributors who have since been deleted, linking to writer profiles it describes as ranging "from stay-at-home dads to computer and information analysts."
Or look at "Denise McNamara," the "information analyst" that TheStreet boasted about — "her extensive personal experience with electronics allows her to share her findings with others online" — whose profile picture is once again listed on the same AI headshot marketplace.
Back in February, when the company first started publishing AI-generated health advice at its magazine Men's Journal, we found that its first story was riddled with errors, prompting it to issue a massive correction.
Needless to say, neither fake authors who are suddenly replaced with different names nor deplorable-quality AI-generated content with no disclosure amount to anything resembling good journalism, and to see it published by a once-iconic magazine like Sports Illustrated is disheartening.
The original article contains 1,620 words, the summary contains 217 words. Saved 87%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Oh come on, Rick Reilly is a real person.