this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
171 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9626 readers
553 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why is this a surprise to anyone?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago

It's not a surprise to anyone in fuckcars, but to wider audiences it could just be a matter of them never considering it. Our parents had cars, now we have cars, cars are used to go places, even if I get stuck in traffic it's worthwhile to get to my destination - end of thought.

Sure there's a huge group of 'carbrains' but in my experience, most people don't have an allegiance one way or the other.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Over a century of relentless propaganda will do that to people.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The low-emission zone only reduced total car traffic by around 5-10%. The reduction in driving to school is much higher than expected.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Weirdly, the abstract on the original paper is a bit clearer than the linked text:

Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes. For children taking active modes at baseline, 5% of children in London and 21% of children in Luton switched to inactive modes.