this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
296 points (99.7% liked)

Privacy

31220 readers
955 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You could say that for everyone pushing for an encryption ban. If they use whatsapp, encryption, if they use https websites, encryption. Banning encryption is nigh impossible, it's like trying to ban prime numbers. What they'll actually do is get even easier backdoors and criminalise the masses that use it while still using it themselves.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

They don't want to ban encryption, they want to block encrypted chat apps, precisely so they don't have to build backdoors. AFAIK it's not possible to break signal/WhatsApp encryption without access to the targeted device, and once you have access you can get the messages directly without having to break the encryption.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's no encryption that a 5$ wrench and a bit o time can't break

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

What if Randall would sell $5 wrenches with XKCD logo?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do we know if the WhatsApp encryption is not breakable, if yes how? It could maybe have backdoors inside

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I guess it could, as we have to take meta's word for it, and a quick google search hasn't turned up any independent security audit.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Encryption for me but not for thee.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago

This logic is the foundation of how the regimes rule the peasants.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s a privilege lol

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Privacy is for the elites, what needs do the peasants have for it anyways?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Let the Elites keep their privacy, and the Peasants their pitchforks.

-- some revolutionary leader? I dunno

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

European aristocracy is scared of the working class. They will tremble...! < Bolshevik chorus swells >

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

This kind of thing just confirms how it's really all about the Power elites keeping an eye out on the plebes trying to organise and change things so that they can kill any such things in the early stages.

Democracy was supposed to slowly bring Autocracies around to its way of doing things but instead what we're seing is the very opposite of that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thumbnail looks like a really confused Canadian flag.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

so, a danish flag.