A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]
Was this meant to be a get-off-my-turf micro aggression that could later be denied if needed by saying it was an accident? But also, if the sonar can injure people, what does it to to whales or fish?
It's been known for years that it's harmful to marine life. Nobody cares. Military imperatives supercede the interest of other lifeforms.
Oh it's so agonising to whales they commit suicide after exposure sometimes.
In case it wasn't obvious, militaries are barbaric murder machines.
I get that we don't want to start a war over a relatively "minor" incident, but a foreign military attacking our military personnel? How is that acceptable in the slightest?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The acting prime minister, Richard Marles, on Saturday said the Australian government had expressed “serious concerns” to Chinese officials after the HMAS Toowoomba encountered a People’s Liberation Army-Navy destroyer on Tuesday.
The Toowoomba was in international waters in Japan’s exclusive economic zone, having worked to enforce United Nations sanctions, and was on its way to a scheduled port visit when fishing nets became entangled around its propellers.
The ship stopped so naval divers could clear the nets and its crew communicated what it was doing through the usual maritime channels, Marles said in a statement.
The Chinese vessel acknowledged the message but came even closer, and was soon after detected operating its hull-mounted sonar, posing a risk to the Australian divers’ safety, Marles said.
The defence force has for decades undertaken surveillance in the region and does so in accordance with international law, Marles said.
On Saturday, Albanese said he witnessed US president Joe Biden involved in a “warm discussion” with Xi during the APEC summit in San Francisco.
The original article contains 433 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Who is downvoting the summary bot? 😅
People who think it didn't do a good job? In this instance, for example, it neglected to mention how the divers were affected, something I'd consider essential to a summary of this article.
It also started mentioning the Chinese vessel without any introduction, something it does quite frequently and that does, in my opinion, hamper the understandability of the text.
At this point I'd rather it just quoted the article verbatim.
It is doing very innaccurate and misleading summaries. I've read a few which completely turned around important points in the actual article. This one is not a great summary either. If people see the downvotes they will hopefully realise the summary is wrong.
Pressure on PM to front up over Chinese naval incident
The Coalition is pressing Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to reveal if he personally challenged China’s President Xi Jinping about injuries inflicted on Australian seamen by a People’s Liberation Army warship last week [...]
The government is now facing criticism for waiting until the end of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) meeting in San Francisco to reveal the incident, in which a Chinese navy destroyer used sonar close to Australian divers causing them to cease repair operations and suffer minor injuries.
Defence Minister Richard Marles issued a statement just after Mr Albanese finished addressing the media in the US and ahead of his flight back to Australia, ensuring the prime minister did not have to answer questions hot on the heels of meeting with Mr Xi on the sidelines of the summit.