this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
93 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3114 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

”RUSSIAN ASSETS… ASSEMBLE!!!”

(No spot for Jill Stein yet??? wtf)

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jill still likes to pretend that she's not funded by Republican donors to siphon off Democrat votes.

I'd love for the Green party (and others) to be an actual viable alternative, but until they are a third party national office vote means almost nothing.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Have you seen the photo of her dining with Putin and his staff, …and Mike Flynn all at the same little round table?

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna742696

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I have. I made somebody really upset a few months ago by pointing out that she was a Russian asset.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Probably UniversalMonk, the Lemmy poster version of a spoiler candidate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh, universal changes display name every week now. Better keep up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't show up differently on Voyager, luckily, so it's really easy to spot right away. I don't want to block outright because it's better to at least be able to see when some bullshit needs to be countered.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Nah, block and be done with it. They like attention.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

We have a lot of those here. Not naming names so as to not summon them.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Two Russian assets?

What's the worst that could happen?

#VOTE!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Two more Russian assets.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Hold on, let me put my shocked and surprised face on......

You mean to tell me their statements about not offering RFK a position in the administration in exchange for him dropping out was......a lie? Trump lied to everybody? Again? Dammit, I refuse to believe that! Next thing you'll be trying to tell me is that he dines with white supremacists and flies around on jets formerly owned by sex traffickers. You make the man sound like he's so stupid he'd find a way to bankrupt a casino.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

He’s got a 900 page playbook already. VOTE.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Transition to prison hopefully

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That almost sounds like he expects to lose. Those two are worthless. It’s probably his way of laundering their payments for services already rendered.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

What if one of Donny's main uses is funding Russian agents with Republican campaign funds.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Vance's days are numbered, huh?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

ELI5: In 2021 the shitstain LOSER's team offered zero cooperation with the incoming WINNERS. With the precedent set, why not return the favor: ransack the place, steal everything you can and fuck off to a dirty hole-in-the-wall in a fetid swamp and await subpoena after subpoena, stall out all efforts to bring justice, cavil and whinge about a nefarious and definitely-not-stolen election for four years? If anusmouth-mushroom penis takes power the least he (they? she?) can expect is the same treatment, right? Am I misguided?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I'm sure that'll go down great with all the other lickspittles that vie for a place in the orange sun.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/trump-rfk-jr-tulsi-gabbard-transition-team.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support