this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
739 points (95.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5726 readers
1446 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 102 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's literally what they're saying out loud now:

On being asked by Ahmad Tibi, one of the Arab MPs within the Israeli Knesset last week if it was legitimate “to insert a stick into a person’s rectum”, Hanoch Milwidsky, a member of Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party, responded: “If he is a Nukhba [Hamas militant], everything is legitimate to do! Everything!”

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well those definitely sound like the words of a person who would decey a warcrime or six /s

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I think they would argue Hamas militants are unlawful combatants (they don't follow laws of war) and the Geneva convection doesn't apply.

I find it funny how if you are fighting someone that doesn't follow the laws of war you can not follow them too but you are not in violation, they are!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Especially with how little damage Hamas has been able to do in comparison to the damage the IDF has caused Palestine for decades. Like, if a child hit an adult, no matter how “unlawful” it was, if the adult drop-kicked them into next week that’d be a huge problem. Now, the only people acting like children are in the Israeli government but you get the idea.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago

Whoever kills an innocent is a piece of shit.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

It's basic fascist logic. Which as the GOP in the US has shown us, you don't need to be fascist to use. "Our chosen enemy is both cowardly/weak and an existential threat at the same time."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Republicans are fascists lmfao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The GOP are the Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but he’s saying they only use the tactics

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It seems I misread the parent comment. I apologize.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Lol especially since it turned out he did think that way anyway. Gotta dance around labels, wouldn’t want Poe or Godwin or whoever to smite our souls

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And how if you listen to russia, Ukraine is both a marionette of the West and a secret mastermind orchestrating the worldwide conspiracy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which hilariously is also antisemitic while also accusing them of being Nazis.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

We really are the root of all evil, huh

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of 9/11 and the Iraqi war.

3,000 souls for 250,000 souls

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Iraqi war wasn't related to 9/11 at all. It was about oil and finishing what daddy started.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but we sure kept Saddam from nuking anyone with his many, many WMDs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It did not start oct. 7 it started back in 1948-1947

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

the ends justify the means but what justifies the ends?

load more comments
view more: next ›