this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
484 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3659 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On X, political commentator Ed Krassenstein, a frequent Trump critic, commented on the change of opinion about polling numbers among the former president's supporters.

"MAGA is breaking down. They are back to calling the polls fake just because they don't reflect what they want them to say," Krassenstein wrote. "It's funny how they touted the polls when Trump was up."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 168 points 3 months ago (8 children)

He's preparing his base for another January 6th.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Has been for 4 years now. It's so frustrating to watch play out in front of our eyes.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When he picked JD Vance he thought for sure he was going to win and almost certainly would have.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Even when he wins, he still casts doubt on the system. Just look at his whining about Hillary in 2017.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup. For the last few months it's been nothing but "Biden is old and loves open borders," but when Kamala starts to pull ahead it's, "be on the lookout for runaway fraud".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

hopi g this time with an American in the white house anyone approaching the capitol will be met with 20mm cannonfire.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Honest question, as a non-American.

Surely any and all secret services will be fully prepared this time, and if some MAGA nutjobs were to try it would result in an absolute massacre, right?

Would they be dumb enough to try? I know that you're all armed to the teeth, but the US Army and Secret Service versus a bunch of cousin-fucking redneck bois is likely to end up in the former winning pretty handily.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

See, you'd think. But unfortunately, as an old song once put it: some of those who work forces are the same who burn crosses

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I think you're right. The last one only kinda almost worked bc bloated mussolini was calling the shots behind deployment of security forces like the national guard. Next time meal team 6 won't just be waltzing past an overwhelmed few capitol police.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I think the bigger issue this time is the potential for distributing the violence to smaller markets, so to speak - polling places, county clerk's offices, secretaries of state, even state houses when they vote to certify their state results.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Remember that fascists think of their enemy as being both weak and strong at the same time. This gives them a blind spot where they're incapable of weighing their enemy's true strength.

They'll try, but they're not as strong as they think they are. The number of Trump voters actually willing to get violent isn't very big. Could get very bloody in a short period of time, but they'll ultimately lose.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

He’s preparing his base for another January 6th.

Let's bring stochastic terrorism back into the parlance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

That's too sloppy. They're gonna go for thing where it goes to, I forget if it was a house of reps vote or where each state gets a singular vote.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 91 points 3 months ago

They're never fake when he's ahead, tho'.

Weird.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Weren't they "fake" in 2016 and 2020 too? The man has such a limited vocabulary, no wonder he appeals to morons.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It was widely reported at the time, but vocabulary analysis put him at about 8th grader level.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

That's a surprisingly in-depth analysis, appreciated. Donnie's brain has been rotting for almost seven additional years now, and the loud noises coming out of his face hole have only become less impressive. It's safe to say he never made it out of middle school.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (3 children)

that's how you win an electrician. by faking poles

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

How does one win an electrician and why would you want one? Their upkeep is very expensive, have you priced a new Fluke meter lately? And they tend to lose them regularly too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

This is the best aneurysm I've ever read

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Funny how the polls were "hugely precise" when they favored him.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The melting mango is losing his shit. I don't think his ticker can take the stress, especially considering it's fueled mostly with hamberders. I'm calling it now-- if he loses the Nov election he'll have a heart attack within 6 months.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My money is on a massive stroke and noone actually recognizes it because the new word salad is just like the old word salad

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

His face drooping wouldn't be new either

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago

Survived a gunshot, killed by the polls less than a month later.

What a weak shitheel.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The only thing going on that's fake, is him.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Is being an "Orangicist" a thing? I think I'm that.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

If Trump wins electoral but loses popular again there better be fucking riots

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago

Oh man, he is big mad (and kinda obviously scared), and that makes me quite happy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

Trumps brain at any given moment: If it is critical of me it must be ____________ 1. Fake 2. A hoax 3. A lie 4. Socialist 5. Communist 6. Horrible. 7. Random noises 8. China 9. Change the topic

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Trump: Looks at Venezuela. "Wait! If I get my cronies in charge of counting the vote and they declare me winner even if it doesn't match the polls, people aren't going to believe it? Well, I better start denigrate the polls!"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Real electoral maps and fake polls below (note electoral maps will become fake if they show any tinge of orange falling behind):

2024 Election Poll Aggregators, Aggregated (August 6, 2024) - Harris vs. Trump

Sources:

270toWin

RealClearPolling

RealClearPolitics

FiveThirtyEight

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Ol wrinkled pussy cant be a self responsible adult enough to just roll with the punches

load more comments
view more: next ›